Minggu, 20 September 2015

Occult Theocracy Chapter VI - VII

CHAPTER VI
EGYPTIAN ESOTERISM



More than any other country, Ancient Egypt was
an illustration of theocratic power. There, priesthood
ruled and adumbrated royalty. Depositories of the
Indo-Iran tradition of Ra, Zarathustra and Manu,
the priests of Thebes and Memphis made of Egypt
the fortress of antique esoterism. Their Sovereign Lord
God and Teacher bore the name of Hermes or Thoth,
the Great Initiator. In him were typified the three
great powers of royalty, law-giving or legislative and
high priesthood which made the Greeks, disciples of
the Egyptians, surname him Hermes Trismegistus or
thrice great.

To Hermes was credited a large number of books
containing the secrets of Indo-Aryan occult science.
Fire was the first Principle, the basis of all teaching
and the law of Ammon-Ra, the Sun God of Thebes.

Only after the conquest of Egypt by the Hyksos
(2000 B. C.) did the priests spread among the people
the cult of Osiris and Isis and their son Horus. This
popular religion served as a screen which most effec-
tively shielded the Hermetic mysteries from intrusion
and disclosure and safeguarded ancient and Aryan esoter-
ism which had to fear annihilation at the hands of
the priesthood of the black or Ethiopian race whose
esoterism was based upon a different conception of
occult and psychic knowledge.

A striking example of the rivalry of the two esoteric
schools is given in the Bible when Moses and Aaron,
practising the magic taught them by the Ethiopian
Jethro, failed to confound the Egyptian priests before
Pharaoh.

Concealed behind the popular cult of Osiris and Isis
was the soul of Egyptian esoterism which no one could
reach, except after having been deemed worthy to
penetrate the most sacred mysteries of Isis whose
statue, with its face veiled, stood before the door of
the temple of occultism.

The trials of initiation which a candidate had to
withstand before he beheld the light of Osiris and under-
stood the " Vision of Hermes " were long and terrible.
They were interspersed, however, by states of trance
induced by special beverages, during which the initiate
had voluptuous visions of Isis preceded by the five-
pointed flamboyant star or the Rose of Isis.

Two great flowing currents issued from the esoteric
wisdom, jealously safeguarded by the Egyptians, namely:
Mosaism or Judaism, taught by Moses whose God was
Jehovah, and Orpheism taught by Orpheus whose God
was Zeus or Jupiter. The former adapted his beliefs
to suit the mentality of undisciplined, rebellious masses
of Israelites in Egypt, hence a god of Fear and Ven-
geance ; the latter legislated for a people whose hellenic
genius touched sublime heights of philosophic wisdom
on the one hand, and sought on the other to carry its
irrepressible sense of beauty and light-heartedness in
its pursuit of material pleasures. Hence the great dif-
ference between the two currents which had derived
their initial teaching from the same source.



CHAPTER VII

JUDAISM

The Pharisees



Judaism has been described by Moses Mendelssohn,
a learned Jew, in this way : — " Judaism is not a reli-
gion but a Law religionized. " This definition does away
effectively with the erroneous belief prevalent among
the non-Jews that Judaism is a religion.

In spite of the loud and frequent assertions, made
by Jews and Christian divines alike, contending that
the Jews were the first monotheists, it is a well proven
fact that the high initiates of the Memphis priesthood
were monotheists long before the Jews ever went to
Egypt.

Judaism would be best described as a rite or com-
pendium of rites, for, if one lends belief to the existence
of the Jewish Lawgiver, Moses, one must bear in mind
that he first studied among the high initiates of
Egypt, and later, became the pupil and son-in-law of
black Jethro, the Ethiopian magician whom one might
call the Father of Voodooism, name given to the magic
practices and rites performed by the negroes.

The closer one studies the history of the Jews, the
clearer it appears that they are neither a religious entity
nor a nation. The absolute failure of Zionism which
was a desperate effort on the part of certain Jewish
leaders to bind all the Jews of the world into a national
entity, whose territory would have been Palestine,
proves the futility of such an effort.

Judaism is not a religion and the Jews are not a
nation, but they are a sect with Judaism as a rite.

The obligations and rules of the rite for the Jewish
masses are contained in the Talmud and Schulchan
Aruk, but the esoteric teachings for the higher initiates
are to be found in the Cabala.

Therein are contained the mysterious rites for evoca-
tions, the indications and keys to practices for conju-
ration of supernatural forces, the science of numbers,
astrology, etc.

The practical application of the Cabalist knowledge
is manifested in the use made of it, through the ages,
by Jews to gain influence both in the higher spheres
of Gentile life and over the masses. Sovereigns and
Popes, both, usually had one or more Jews as astrol-
ogers and advisers, and they frequently gave Jews
control over their very life by employing them as
physicians. Political power was thus gained by Jews
in almost every Gentile country alongside with finan-
cial power, since Jewish court-bankers manipulated
state funds and taxes.

Through the ages also, can be followed the spreading
power of the sect, and no more awful example of the
devastating and destructive power of the penetration
of a secret subversive society has ever been witnessed.

With its B'nai B'rith Supreme Council as the direc-
ting head, the sect with its members swarming among
all nations has become the sovereign power ruling in
the councils of all nations and governing their poli-
tical, economic, religious and educational policies.

In his book Nicholas II et les Juifs, Netchvolodow
explains that " the Chaldean science acquired by
many of the Jewish priests, during the captivity of
Babylon, gave birth to the sect of the Pharisees whose
name only appears in the Holy Scriptures and in the
writings of the Jewish historians after the captivity
(606 B. C). The works of the celebrated scientist Munk
leave no doubt on the point that the sect appeared
during the period of the captivity.

" From then dates the Cabala or Tradition of the
Pharisees. For a long time their precepts were only
transmitted orally but later they formed the Talmud
and received their final form in the book called the
Sepher ha Zohar. "

The Pharisees were, as it were, a class whose tendency
was to form a kind of intellectual aristocracy among
the Jews. At first, they formed a sort of brotherhood,
a haburah, the members being called haburim or
brothers. They were a subversive element, aiming
at the overthrow of the Sadducean High-priesthood,
whose members prided themselves on their aristocracy
of blood and birth, to which the Pharisees opposed
an aristocracy of learning. The war waged by the latter
extends over a long period of time, and the rivalry was
bitter. The Pharisees, who, although they professed,
as one of their chief tenets, the utmost contempt of
the am-haretz or simple people, did not overlook
the fact that they needed their mass support for the
attainment of their own aim, and they enlisted it by
opposing the Sadducean strictness of the Law in many
instances, namely, in the observance of the Sabbath.

The power of the Sadducees fell with the destruction
of the Temple by Titus and thenceforth the Pharisaic
element held supremacy among the Jews.

1. Lt. Gen. A. Netchvolodow, Nicolas II et les Juifs, p. 139.


Quoting an acknowledged authority on Judaism,
Mr. Flavien Brenier, Lt. Gen. Netchvolodow further
describes the policy of the sect as follows : 2

" Before appearing proudly as the expression of
Jewish aspirations, The Tradition of the Pharisees had
serious difficulties to surmount, the chief of which was
the revival of the orthodox faith stimulated in the
Jewish people by the Captivity. To the exiles, bemoan-
ing the fall of the Temple of Jerusalem and begging
Jehovah to end the misfortunes of their homeland, the
revelation that Jehovah was only a phantom, entailed
not only certain defeat, but also their own exposure
to perils the least of which would have been the loss
of all authority over Israel.

" The Pharisees then, judging it wiser to capture
the confidence of their compatriots by taking the lead
of the religious movement, affected a scrupulous obser-
vance of the slightest prescriptions of the law and
instituted the practice of complicated rituals, simul-
taneously however cultivating the new doctrine in
their secret sanctuaries. These were regular secret
societies, composed during the captivity of a few hun-
dred adepts. At the time of Flavius Josephus which was
that of their greatest prosperity they numbered only
some 6,000 members.

" This group of intellectual pantheists was soon to
acquire a directing influence over the Jewish nation.
Nothing, moreover, likely to offend national sentiment
ever appeared in their doctrines. However saturated
with pantheistic Chaldeism they might have been, the
Pharisees preserved their ethnic pride intact. This
religion of Man divinised, which they had absorbed
at Babylon, they conceived solely as applying to the

2. Ibid., p. 139 et seq.


profit of the Jew, the superior and predestined being.
The promises of universal dominion which the orthodox
Jew found in the Law, the Pharisees did not interpret
in the sense of the reign of the God of Moses over the
nations, but in that of a material domination to be
imposed on the universe by the Jews. The awaited
Messiah was no longer the Redeemer of original Sin, a
spiritual victor who would lead the world, it was a
temporal king, bloody with battle, who would make
Israel master of the world and ' drag all peoples under
the wheels of his chariot'. The Pharisees did not ask
this enslavement of the nations of a mystical Jehovah,
which they continued worshipping in public, only as
a concession to popular opinion, for they expected its
eventual consummation to be achieved by the secular
patience of Israel and the use of human means.

" Monstrously different from the ancient law were
such principles as these, but they had nothing one
could see, which might have rendered unpopular
those who let them filter, drop by drop, among the
Jews.

" The admirably conceived organization of the Pha-
risees did not fail soon to bear fruit.

" One cannot better define its action in the midst
of Jewish society before Jesus Christ, " said Mr. Fla-
vien Brenier, " than in comparing it with that of the
Freemasons in modern society. "

" A carefully restricted membership tightly bound,
imposing on their members the religion of ' the secret',
the Pharisees pursued relentlessly their double aim
which was : —

1. The seizure of political power, by the possession of the
great political offices (the influence of which was tremendous
in the reconstituted Jewish nation) and the conquest of the
Sanhedrin (Jewish parliament).

" 2. To modify gradually the conceptions of the people in
the direction of their secret doctrine. "

The first of these aims was achieved when Hillel,
a Pharisee of Babylon who claimed Davidic descent,
was elected president of the Sanhedrin. Thus ended
the bitter fight between the Pharisees and the Sad-
ducees. Opposed to Hillel was Shammai, a Sadducee,
supporter of the Sadducean High Priest who was made
Chief Judge of the assembly. The attitude of the two men
towards each other is a matter of long record in the Talmud

Among the most noted Pharisees, after Hillel, are : —
Yochanan ben Zakkai, founder of the school of Yamnai,
Akibah who, with Bar Cochba, fomented the revolt
against the Romans under Hadrian, rebellion ending
with the order for the dispersion of Jews (132 A. D.)
Also Simon ben Yohai, who might be termed the great
Magician and Father of the Cabala, lastly Judah
the Prince who compiled the Babylonian Talmud.
Under these chiefs, the Pharisaic power was definitely
established in the Sanhedrin. Those among the Jews
who clung to the Sadducean tradition and refused to
acknowledge the dominion of the Pharisees, remained
as dissidents. Such were the Samaritans and the
Karaites who rejected the Talmud.

The second of the aims and its method of attain-
ment is exposed in the so-called Protocols of the Wise
Men of Zion so loudly denounced by the descendants
of those who devised The Secret Doctrine in Israel,
Israel here meaning the Jews as a religious community,
most of whom remain quite ignorant of the intricate
subversive schemes imputed to them.

The attitude of Jesus Christ to this sect is definitely
expressed in the New Testament (see Luke xi and
John viii).

Exoteric Judaism, the Jewish religion as practised
in the twentieth century, is based on the Old Testa-
ment, and on equally ancient commentaries on it, pre-
served for ages as oral traditions, and known, as above
stated, under the general name of The Talmud. All copies
of this book were ordered to be burned by Philip IV,
the Fair, King of France, in 1306, but the book sur-
vived the holocaust.

We know that the Jewish God is not the father of
all men and the ideal of love, justice and mercy, like
the Christian God, or even like Ahura-Mazda or Brahma.
On the contrary, he is the God of vengeance down to
the fourth generation, just and merciful only to his
own people, but foe to all other nations, denying them
human rights and commanding their enslavement that
Israel might appropriate their riches and rule over
them.

The following quotations will serve to illustrate this
point : —

" And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before
thee ; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them ; thou
shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto
them. " — Deut. vii, 2.

" For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God :
the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people
unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the
earth. " — Deut. vii, 6.

The Talmud comments upon it : " You are human
beings, but the nations of the world are not human
beings but beasts. " Baba Mecia 114,6.

On the house of the Goy (non-Jew) one looks
as on the fold of cattle. " — Tosefta, Erubin viii.

From The Talmud (a prayer said on the eve of
Passover, to the present day) " We beg Thee, Lord,

indict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee,
and not calling on Thy name. Let down Thy wrath on
them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them
away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take
away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment indict
all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy
nation. Draw out with the root, disperse and ruin
unworthy nations. Destroy them ! Destroy them imme-
diately, in this very moment! " — (Pranajtis ; Chris-
tianas in Talmudas Judeorum, quotations from : Syna-
goga Judaica, p. 212. Minhagin, p. 23. Crach Chaim
480 Hagah).

" When one sees inhabited houses of the ' Goy '
one says, ' The Lord will destroy the house of the
proud '. And when one sees them destroyed he says,
' The Lord God of Vengeance has revealed himself ' —
(The Babylonian Talmud, Berachot 58,6.)

" Those who do not own Torah and the prophets
must all be killed. Who has power to kill them, let
him kill them openly with the sword, if not, let him
use artifices till they are done away with. " — (Schul-
chan Aruch : Choszen Hamiszpat, 425,50).

The Jewish Sages soon understood that Christ's
way of commenting upon the old Law introduced,
instead of hatred towards foreign nations, brotherly
feelings and equality of all men in the face of God, thus
denying the Jews their privileged position as masters
of the world.

At the same time, Christ's reforming the very primi-
tive and rough moral ideas of the Old Testament,
deprived the Jews of their very convenient-in-the-
battle-of-life, unscrupulous, double morality. Thence
the Jewish hatred for the Christian faith is conspicuous
in the following quotations from Talmudic sources : —


" The estates of the Goys are like wilderness, who first
settles in them has a right to them. (Baba Batra, 54 b.)

" The property of the Goys is like a thing without a mas-
ter. " (Schulchan Aruch : Choszen Hamiszpat, 156,5).

" If a Jew has struck his spade into the ground of the
Goy, he has become the master of the whole. " (Baba Batra,
55 a.)

In order to enhance the authority of the Old Testa-
ment equally recognized by the Christians, while simul-
taneously augmenting that of the Talmud and the
Rabbis, its commentators and authors teach : —

" In the law (the Bible) are things more or less important,
but the words of the Learned in the Scripture are always
important.

" It is more wicked to protest the words of the rabbis
than of Torah " (Miszna, Sanhedryn xi, 3.) " Who changes
the words of the rabbis ought to die. " (Erubin, 21, b.)

" The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God.
Jehovah himself asks the opinion of earthly rabbis when
there are difficult affairs in heaven. " (Rabbi Menachem,
Comments for the Fifth Book.)

" Jehovah himself in heaven studies the Talmud, stand-
ing : he has such respect for that book. " (Tr. Mechilla).

To enhance the dignity of religions dogmas the
following commandments are given :

" That the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by
God, while all the remaining ones are contemptible and
hateful.

" That all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish
nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without
any scruples. "

" That an orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles
of morality towards people of other nations, and on the contrary, he even ought to
act against morality, if it were profitable for himself or for the interest ofjews
in general. "

" A Jew may rob a Goy (Goy means unclean, and is the
disparaging name for a non-Jew), he may cheat him over
a bill, which should not be perceived by him, otherwise the
name of God would become dishonoured. " (Schulchan Aruch,
Choszen Hamiszpat, 348.)

" Should a Goy to whom a Jew owed some money die
without his heirs knowing about the debt, the Jew is not
bound to pay the debt. " (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamisz-
pat 283, 1.)

" The son of Noah, who would steal a farthing ought to
be put to death, but an Israelite is allowed to do injury to
a goy; where it is written, Thou shalt not do injury to thy
neighbour, is not said, Thou shalt not do injury to a goy. "
(Miszna, Sanhedryn, 57.)

" A thing lost by a goy may not only be kept by the man
who found it, but it is forbidden to give it back to him. "
(Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat. 266, 1.)

" Who took an oath in the presence of the goys, the rob-
bers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible. "
(Tosefta Szebnot, 11.)

" In order to annul marriages, oaths and promises, a
Jew must go to the rabbi, and if he is absent, he must call
three other Jews, and say to them that he is sorry to have
done it, and they say, ' Thou art allowed to. ' (Schulchan
Aruch, 2, 1. 247.)

The Kol Nidre prayer on the Day of Judgment, that
acquits beforehand from the nonfulfilment of all kinds
of oaths and vows, is given here.

" All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swea-
ring, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation,
we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves
to fulfil, we are sorry for already, and they shall be
annulled, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, value-
less, unimportant, our vow shall be no vows, and our
oaths no oaths at all. " (Schulchan Aruch, edit. I.,
136).




" If a goy wants a Jew to stand witness against a
Jew at the Court of Law, and the Jew could give fair
evidence, he is forbidden to do it, but if a Jew wants
a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a goy,
he may do it. " — (Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamisz-
pat, 28 art, 3 and 4.)

" Should a Jew inform the goyish authorities that
another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer
a loss through it, he must give him remuneration. "
(Schulchan Aruch. ~ Ch. Ha., 338.)

" If there is no doubt that someone thrice betrayed
the Jews, or caused that their money passed to the
goys, a means and wise council must be found to do
away with him. "

" Every one must contribute to the expense of the
community (Kahal) in order to do away with the trai-
tor. " Ibid., 163, 1.)

" It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator every-
where it is permitted to kill him before he has
denounced.... though it is necessary to warn him and
say, ' Do not denounce. ' But should he say, ' I will
denounce, ' he must be killed, and he who accomplishes it first will have the greater merit. " (Ibid., 388,
10.)

" How to interpret the word ' robbery '. A goy is
forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc.,
from a goy or from a Jew, but he (a Jew) is not forbidden
to do all this to a goy. " (Tosefta, Aboda Zara, viii,
5.)

" If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but
if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible. "(Ibid.,
viii, 5.)

The authors of the Talmud, having issued this horrible
moral code, that acquits all kinds of crimes, in order
to make easier the strife with foreigners to their own
nation, understood the necessity of keeping its contents a secret and thus legislated :

" To communicate anything to a goy about our religious
relations would be equal to the killing of all the Jews, for
if the goys knew what we teach about them, they would
kill us openly. " (Book ofLibbre David, 37.)

" It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the Law.
He who would do it would be as guilty as if he des-
troyed the whole world " (Jaktu Chadasz, 171,2).
The restrictions and commandments bearing this in
view were raised to the dignity of dogmas of faith. It
is not astonishing that in face of such prohibitions the
secrets of the Talmud have been so little known to other
nations, especially to the Western ones, and till the
present day, even the most progressive and citizen-like
Jews think the disclosure of the principles of the Tal-
mud a proof of the most outrageous intolerance, and
an attack on the Jewish religion.

In order to separate the Jewish nation from all
others, and thus prevent it from mixing with them,
and losing their national peculiarities, a great many
precepts of the ritual and rules for every-day life, pre-
judices and superstitions, the remainder of the times
of barbarism and obscurity, have been gathered in
the Talmud and consecrated as canons. The precepts
observed by Eastern Jews till the present day deride
even the most simple notions of culture and hygiene.
For instance they enjoin :

" If a Jew be called to explain any part of the rabbinic
books, he only ought to give a false explanation, that he
might not, by behaving differently, become an accomplice in
betraying this information. Who will violate this order shall
be put to death. " (Libbre David, 37.)

" It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the Law. "


" One should and must make false oath, when the goys
ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we
are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that. "
(Szaalot-Utszabot. The book of J ore d'a, 17.)

" Every goy who studies Talmud, and every Jew who
helps him in it, ought to die. " (Sanhedryn 59 a. Aboda Zora
8-6. Szagiga 13.)

" The ears of the goys are filthy, their baths, houses,
countries are filthy. " (Tosefta Mikwat, v. 1.)

" A boy-goy after nine years and one day old, and a girl
after three years and one day old, are considered filthy. "
{Pereferkowicz : Talmud t. v., p. 11.)

These principles afford an explanation of the action
of governments in excluding Jews from judicial and
military positions. They also explain that mysterious
phenomenon known as Antisemitism.

In his Manual of Freemasonry Richard Carlile makes
the following observations : 3

" The disposition of the mistaken Jew is to mono-
polise his portion of the Sacred Scriptures as a charm
or benefit prepared and presented to his people in
their sectarian character.

" That there was no such nation as the Israelites,
is a truth — found in the consideration that they are
not mentioned beyond the Bible in any records what-
ever. Egypt knew them not, Persia knew them not,
Hindostan knew them not, Scythia knew them not,
Phoenicia knew them not, Greece knew them not, as
a nation. And in the first general notice that we have
of the Jews, they are introduced to the world as a
sect, or a series of sects, being Pharisees, Sadducees,
and Essenes ; and in that general notice, beyond that
sort of mistaken allegorical history which Josephus

• Carlile, Manual of Freemasonry, p. 88.

has copied from the books of the Old Testament, and
which is not otherwise corroborated, and no better
authority than the book of the Old Testament, there
is no presentation of the Jews as the descendants of
a larger nation of Israelites ; as a religious or philosophical sect of distinction
, mixed up with, and found
in real human history, they are not to be traced higher
than the century before the Christian era. It is satis-
factory to be able to show the origin of anything, for
such a knowledge is a common passion and curiosity
among mankind ; and I think the Rev. Robert Taylor
has discovered and developed the origin of the titles
of Hebrew, Israelite, and Jew. 4

" Hebrew, Israelite, and Jew, are Syriac, Phoenician
and Egyptian terms used in the mysterious degrees ;
and it would be as reasonable to argue that the Free-
masons are a dispersed nation, as that the Jews are,
or were, a dispersed nation. The Rev. Mr. Taylor has
beautifully explained this in his discourses. 5

" The scenes and characters of the mysterious drama,
as found in the Eleusinian Orgies of Greece, were : —

Eleusis. — The Advent, or coming-in light — • the birth
and character of the subject of the drama — the title of
the whole play or mystery.

Hierophant. — The Expounder of the Mysteries, the High
Priest, the Pope, the Archbishop.

Hupereet. — The Minister, or Ordinary Priest.

Diaconos. — The Deacon, or Lower Officer.

Diadochos. — The Torch-bearer.

Photagogue. — The Bringer-in of Light.

Autoptos. — The Candidate admitted to see the sight.
The visitor of the Temple — the Church- and Chapel-goer.

Autopsy. — The sight itself.

4. Ibid., p. viii.

5. Ibid., p. x i .

Hebrew. — The initiated Candidate who had passed through
all the degrees of the mystery.

Teleios. — The adept, or perfected.

Israelite. — God-seer, purified from all guile.

Jew . — The God himself, or the mysterious perfection and
deification of the human character.

" The whole type of what may be made of human nature
by cultivation of mind, which is the conditional promise
of paradise, or kingdom of heaven. This is the revelation of
all the mysteries. "

Carlile further states 6 " We are prepared with
historical disproofs of the existence of such a people
as Israelites or Jews as a nation. They were a religious
or philosophical sect, who had been made adepts in
the higher Pagan Mysteries : a sect among nations ;
but not a nation among sects. "

Judaism sanctions Gnosticism which is further elabo-
rated in their books of the Cabala. For further study
of this subject we refer the reader to Chapter XIII.

6. Ibid., p. v of Introduction.





Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar