Mention
of the Holders of Power in the
Kingdom
of Persia after Ardashlr b. Babak
[Sabur I, called Sabur al-Junud ] 81
When Ardashlr b. Babak died, there succeeded to power in Persia 82
his son Sabur. When Ardashlr b. Babak had attained the royal
power, he wrought great slaughter among the Arsacids (al-
Ashakaniyyah), 83 to whom belonged the "Party Kings,"
until he
had exterminated them, in accordance with an oath which Sasan
the elder, son of Ardashlr, son of Bahman, son of Isfandiyar, the
ancestor of Ardashlr b. Babak, had sworn: that, if at some point,
he
should attain the royal power, he would not spare a single one of
the progeny of Ashak, son of Khurrah. He had further laid this
charge on his descendants, and had instructed them in his testament
not to leave alive a single one of the Arsacids if they should
succeed to power [immediately after him] or if one of them should
[eventually] attain to royal power one day. The first of his descendants
and progeny to achieve this
power was Ardashlr, son of
81. That is, "Sabur of the Armies."
82. Here, for the first time in the present text, Far(i)s
seems to mean the land of
Persia in general rather than the province of Pars,
cradle of ancient Persian mon-
archy, in particular.
83. The Arabic name for the dynasty goes back to the
eponymous founder of the
line, Arshaka, Parthian ’r$k, Greek Arsaces, who seized
power in northern Parthia
ca. 247 b.c., henceforth the beginning of the Parthian
era. See Noldeke, trans. 26
n.i; Bivar, "The Political History of Iran under the
Arsacids," 28, 98.
24
Holders of Power after Ardashlr b. Babak
Babak. Hence Ardashlr massacred the Arsacids en bloc, women
and menfolk alike, not sparing a single one of them, in accordance
with the intention of his forefather Sasan. 84
It is mentioned that he left no one alive except a maiden whom
he had found in the royal palace. He was struck by her beauty, and
asked her— she was really the slaughtered king's daughter — about
her origins. She stated that she was the handmaiden of one of the
king's wives. He then asked her whether she was a virgin or had
previously been married. She told him that she was a virgin. So he
had sexual intercourse with her and took her as one of his concubines,
and in due course she became pregnant by him. Now
when she became assured of her own safety in regard to him,
because of her firm position in his affections through her pregnancy,
she informed him that she was really from the progeny of
Ashak. However, he recoiled from her, and summoned Harjand,
son of Sam, 85 a man of great seniority and advanced years, and
told
him that she was from Ashak's progeny. Ardashlr went on to say,
“It is incumbent upon us to keep faith with our forefather Sasan's
vow, even though she has become dear to my own heart, as you
well know. So take her away and kill her!" The old man went
off
to kill her. She told him that she was pregnant. He took her along
to
the midwives, who confirmed that she was indeed pregnant. He
consigned her to an underground cellar. Then he cut off his own
84. Whether the Arsacid royal family, the line of
Ardawan, was so thoroughly
exterminated is hard to determine, but the Arsacid
dynasty in Armenia, which had
come to power when Tiridates I was crowned king of
Armenia by the Roman
emperor Nero in a.d. 66, continued to rule there till the
early fifth century; the
Armenian Arsacids considered themselves the holders of
legitimate Iranian rule
and, not surprisingly, their relations with the upstart
Sasanid supplanters of their
kinsmen in Persia always remained strongly hostile. See
D. M. Lang, "Iran, Ar-
menia and Georgia," 517-18. Whatever the fate of
members of the Arsacid royal
house in Persia, many of the great Parthian "feudal"
families seem gradually to
have made their peace with the Sasanids and to have
entered their service; such
was certainly the case with the Karen, Suren, and Mihran
families. See Noldeke,
trans. 16 n. r ? Frye, "The Political History of
Iran under the Sasanians," 119-20.
85 . Perhaps one should read here Abaisdm (on Abarsam,
see n. 29 above) for the
text's H.r.j.n.d ibn Sam, as in al-DInawari, al-Akhbai
al-tiwal, 43-45, where he is
described as Ardashir's wazir. This last historian in
fact gives the story of Abar-
sam's self-mutilation and the birth of Shapur I, the only
one of the other Arabic
sources on the Sasanids to note it. See also Noldeke,
trans. 27 n. 2.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak 25
genitalia and placed them in a box, which he sealed. He returned to
the king. The king said to him, "What have you done? " He
replied,
"I have consigned her to the bowels of he earth," and he
handed
over the box to the king, asking him to seal it with his personal
seal
and to place it in one of his treasuries; this Ardashir did.
The girl remained with the old man until she gave birth to a
baby boy. The old man did not want to give the king's son a name
inferior to his status, nor did he wish to tell him about his real
rank when he was still a child, but only when he was grown up and
had completed his education and acquisition of good manners
(1 adab ). The old man had actually determined the astral conjunctions
at the moment of the boy's birth and had worked out for him
his horoscope; he realized from this that the child would eventually
become a ruler, hence he gave him a name which would be
both a description and also a true personal name, in that he would
subsequently have a choice regarding it when he knew all about it
(i.e. whether it was intended for him as a descriptive or a
personal
name). Hence he called him Shah Bur, which means in Arabic
"king's son" ( ibn al-malik), and he was the first person
to be thus
named. 86 This was Ardashir's son, Sabur al-Junud. Other authorities
say, on the other hand, that
he called him Ashah Bur,
meaning in Arabic "the son of Ashak," from whose progeny
the
boy's mother stemmed.
Ardashir passed several years in a childless state. Then the faith-
ful old man, who had the child in his care, went into the king's
presence and found him deep in sorrow. He asked him, "What is
making you so sad, O King?" Ardashir replied, "Why should
I not
be sad? Although by means of my sword I have seized everything
between the East and the West, although I have conquered everything
I wanted and although I have
complete control over the
kingdom, the kingdom of my forefathers, yet I shall die in the end,
leaving no offspring behind to succeed to my authority, and there
will be no enduring trace of me within the royal power during the
86. Conveniently forgetting here Ardashu^s prematurely
deceased brother
Shabur, see al-Tabari, 1 , 816, p. 8, above, and taking
no account of the fact that the future Shabur (I) must have been bom well
before the defeat of ArdawSn and the overthrow of the Arsacids. See Noldeke,
trans. 28 n. r.
i6 Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
future.' 7 But the old man said to him, "May God grant you
joy, O
King, and give you long life! I have in my care a fine, noble son
of
yours. Call for the box which I entrusted to you, and which you
personally sealed, to be brought in, and I will show you the decisive
proof of that." Ardashir sent for the box. He examined the
impression of his seal, and then he broke it and opened the box. In
it he found the old man's genitalia and a document on which it
was written: "When we ascertained that the daughter of Ashak
had indeed conceived by the King of Kings Ardashir, at the same
time when the latter ordered us to kill her, she being pregnant, we
did not consider it lawful to destroy the noble seed of the king.
So
we consigned her to the bowels of the earth, as our monarch had
commanded us, and we exonerated ourselves in his sight from any
guilt (i.e., by the self-mutilation), lest any calumniator find any
means to forge lies against her. We made it our concern to protect
the rightfully sown seed until it should be united once again with
its own kindred. This took place at so-and-so time in so-and-so
year."
On hearing all this, Ardashir ordered the old man to place the
boy among a group of a hundred youths — according to others,
among a thousand youths — all of exactly the same appearance and
height as the boy, and then to parade them before him in a body,
avoiding any distinguishing features of clothing, height, and demeanor.
The old man did this. When Ardashir looked at this group
of youths, his instinct immediately recognized his own son out of
all the throng, and he found him pleasing, without there having
been made any indication of him or muttered hint concerning him
to the king. Then he gave commands for them all to be brought
into the antechamber of the royal palace (hu/rat al-aywdn). They
were provided with polo sticks, and they set to playing with a
ball,
the king meanwhile being seated on his throne inside the palace
proper [al-aywdn]. 87 The ball flew into the palace chamber where
the king was. All the youths held back from entering the place
chamber, but Sabur pushed his way forward from their midst and
went in. Ardashir now deduced from Sabur's entry into his -
87. Historical romance and legend does in fact describe
Ardashir as the first
prominent enthusiast for polo, as, e.g., in the
Karnamag-i ArdaSIr-i Pabagan. See
£P, s.v. Cawgan (H. Masse).
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak 27
presence, his thrusting forward and his temerity — all this being
in
addition to the feeling in his heart for acceptance of Sabur, which
he had felt on the first occasion when he saw him, and his tender
sentiments toward him, quite lacking in regard to all his
comrades — that he was indeed his own son. Ardashir said to him
in Persian, "What is your name?" The youth answered,
"Shah
Bur." Ardashir exclaimed, "The king's son (shah
bur)!" When he
was completely certain that the youth really was his son, he publicly
acknowledged him and hailed him as heir after himself. 88
The Persian people had already experienced, before the royal
power passed to Sabur and during his father's lifetime, Sabur's
intelligence, virtue, and knowledge, combined with ardor in battle,
eloquence, and wit, tenderness toward the subjects, and mildness.
When the crown was [eventually] placed on his head (i.e.,
after his father's death), he gathered together before him all the
great men of state. They then sent up prayers for his long life and
went on at length in mentioning his father and the latter's excellent
characteristics. Sabur informed them that they could not
have invoked his benevolence by any means more acceptable to
him than by what they had said about his father, and he gave them
promises of beneficence. Then he gave orders that the riches in the
treasuries were to be lavished on the people (al-nas, i.e., the
landed
and military classes who were the supports of the state), sharing
them out among those whom he deemed worthy of receiving
them— the prominent persons, the troops, and those [of them]
who had fallen into indigence (ahl al-hajah). He wrote to his governors
in the provinces and outlying districts that they were to do
likewise with the wealth under their control. 89 In this way, he
distributed his bounty and beneficence to those near and far, noble
and humble, the aristocracy and the generality of people, so that
all shared in this benevolence and their standard of daily life was
thereby raised. Then he chose governors over the populace, and
88. As Noldeke notes, trans. 30 n. 2, this tale of
Ardashir's recognition of Shabur
as his son and his appointing him his heir, is pure
fantasy.
89. Noldeke, trans. 31 n. 1, regarded it as highly
unlikely that a powerful mon-
arch like Shabur, who intended vigorously to prosecute
the wars with the Romans, would thus dissipate the wealth in his treasuries,
especially as Persian rulers seem, even at the best of times, always to have
been short of money for their military ventures.
28
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
kept a keen watch over them and over the subjects in general.
Thus the meritoriousness of his good conduct became clear, his
fame spread widely and he stood out above all other monarchs.
It is said that, in the eleventh year of his reign, he marched
against the city of Nisibin , 90 where there was a garrison of
Roman
troops, and besieged them for a considerable period of time . 91
But
then he received news of happenings in one of the regions of
Khurasan that required his personal attention, so he headed for
there, restored order and returned to Nisibin. They allege that the
city's wall split asunder of its own accord, and a breach was
opened up for Sabur, by means of which he was able to gain entry.
He then killed the [defending] soldiers, enslaved the women and
children, and seized an immense sum of wealth stored up there for
Qaysar (i.e., the Roman emperor). Then he traversed the territory
to Syria and Roman Anatolia ( bilad al-Rum), and conquered a
90. Nisibin or Nasibin, Greek Nasibis, was one of the
most important towns
and fortresses of Upper Mesopotamia, situated on the
Himas river, an affluent of
the Khabur, in the plain to the south of the mountainous
region of Tur 'Abdin. In
Roman and Byzantine times it came within the district of
Beth 'Arabhaye, and in
early Islamic times, in that of Diyar Rabi'ah within the
province of al-jazlrah.
Known as a settlement in Assyrian times, possession of it
oscillated between the
Parthians and the Romans, until in a.d. 195 Septimius
Severus came to Ni?ibin
and made it the capital of the new province of Septimia
Nesibi Colonia. Control of the region was disputed by the Romans and Persians
more or less continuously in the third and fourth centuries, with this campaign
of Shabur I's falling in the 250s (see n. 91 below); but after the peace
agreement of 363 between Jovian and Shabur n, Nisibin and Sinjar or Singara
passed under Persian control more or less permanently. This period of Persian
domination enabled Nisibin to become an especially flourishing center of the
(to the Byzantines, heretical) Nestorian Church; under this last, it functioned
as the metropolitan seat for the region of Beth 'Arabhaye.
See Yaqut, Buldan, V, 288-89; PW, XVII/i, s.v. Nisibis
(J. Sturm); Le Strange,
Lands, 94-95; Labourt, Le Christianisme dans l’empiie
perse, 83; Christensen,
Sassanides, 218-24; Canard, Histoiie de la dynastie des
H’amdanides, ioo-ioi;
Frye, "The Political History of Iran under the
Sasanians," 125, 137-38; EP, s.v.
Nasibin (E. Honigmann-C. E. Bosworth).
91. No clear picture emerges from the scattered details
in the sources about
Shabur's wars against Rome, with a resultant uncertainty
about chronology. The
eleventh year of Shabur's reign would be 25 1, and it is
possible that Nisibin was
attacked (and for at least the second time) in 251 or
252; but Shabur's expeditions
into Asia Minor and Syria must have extended beyond that
date, and the emperor
Valerian did not in any case begin his reign until 2 5 3
. See Noldeke, trans. 3 1 n. 3; E. Stein, Histoiie du Bas-Empire. I. De Pet at
romain d l'et at byzantin (284-476), 6 ; and the discussion of the dating of
the Persian capture of Nisibin at this time in E. Kettenhofen, Die
romisch-persischen Kriege des 3. fahrhunderts nach Chr. nach der Inschrift
Sapuhrs I. an dei Ka'be-ye ZartoSt ($KZ), 44-46.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
29
large number of the cities there. Among these, he is said to have
conquered Qaluqiyyah (Cilicia) and Qadhuqiyyah (Cappadocia)
and to have besieged one of the [Roman] kings who happened to be
in Anatolia called al-Riyanus (Valerian[us ]) 92 in the city of
Antioch.
He took him prisoner, and transported him, and a large number
of the troops who were with him, and settled them at Junday
Sabur ( Jundlshapur ). 93 It is mentioned that he compelled al-
92. That is, the emperor Valerian, Publius Licinius
Valerianus (r. 253-60). See
on him Deikleine Pauly, V, s.v. Valerianus (G. Winckler).
W. B. Henning observed that it was strange that the tradition that came down to
al-Tabari from the Xwaday-namag, with the name as al-Riyanus, rendered the
Roman emperor's
name more correctly than did Shabur's victory inscription
(see next note), with its
wry'rnswy. See his "The Great Inscription of Shapur
I," 834.
93. According to the trilingual (in Parthian, Middle
Persian, and Greek) inscrip-
tion erected by Shabur on the Ka'bah-yi Zardusht at
Naqsh-i Rustam in 260 or
shortly afterward, the Persian emperor captured Valerian
with his own hands. The
question of the exact dating of the capture of the Roman
emperor — for which
August or September 260 would seem to be tezmini post
quem — is discussed by
Kettenhofen, Die tomisch-peisischen Kziege des 3.
Jahzhunderts nach Chr., 97-
99 -
The discovery of the Ka'ba-yi Zardusht trilinguis (§KZ)
by the Chicago University Persepolis Expedition of 1936-39 marked a great step
forward in our knowledge of the campaigns of Shabur against the Romans and of
the history of the early Sasanid rulers in general. Wiesehofer has emphasized
that inscriptions like this one at Naqsh-i Rustam, the inscription of Narseh at
Paikuli (see n. 141 below) and that of the High Priest Kerder at Naqsh-i Rajab,
are important inter alia for their information on the early Sasanid court and
its officials, and on the contemporary conception of royal power and its
relationship to the divinity Ahura Mazda, and, in part, as zes gestae, the
exploits of the Sasanids, thus supplying a corrective to non- Persian sources
such as the Byzantine ones; see his Ancient Persia, pp. 154-55.
The information of the three texts making up the complete
Ka'ba-yi Zardusht
inscription, as edited by Martin Sprengling (the two
Middle Iranian texts) and
Andr6 Maricq (the Greek text) has been compared and
integrated with the information of the Greek and Latin historical texts, of
coin legends, etc., by Kettenhofen in his monograph mentioned in the previous paragraph,
meant to accompany his TAVO map (BV 11) Voidezez Orient. Romei und Sasaniden in
der Zeit der Reichskrise (224-284 n. Chr.) and its Sonderkarte, Die Kriege
Sapuhrs 1 . mit Romnach $KZ; the monograph itself includes three maps
illustrating Roman and Sasanid campaigns in Asia Minor, Syria, and Mesopotamia.
A new Gesamtedition of the three SKZ texts is being prepared by Dr. Philip
Huyse and will appear as part of the Corpus Inscriptionum Iianicarum under (die
title Die dreispzachige In- schzift Sabuhr’s I. an der Ka'ba-i ZarduSt ($KZ).
Shabur's victories over the Romans were also immortalised
for him in such rock
reliefs as at Naqsh-i Rustam and in those of the Bishapur
gorge. See H enning, "The Great Inscription of Shapur I," 833-35;
Christensen, Sassanides, 221-24; Herrmann, The Iranian Revival, 92-94, 96-98;
Gignoux, "Middle Persian Inscription
30
Holders of Power after Ardashlr b. Babak
Riyanus to set to work building a dam ( shadmwan ) at Tustar,
whose breadth was to be one thousand cubits . 94 The Roman [emperor]
constructed this with the aid of a group of men whom he
had caused to be brought from Anatolia, and he held Sabur to a
promise to free him once the dam was completed. It is said that
" 1207-1209.
The Sasanid foundation, or rather re-foundation, in
al-Ahwaz or Khuzistan of
Gondeshabur is given by al-Tabari, I, 830-31, pp. 38-39
below, the original name
in New Persian of Bih-az-Andiyu Sabur "Better than
Antioch (has) Sabur (built
this)," repeated thus in Hamzah al-Isfahani, 45 (the
MP equivalent would be *Weh az Andiyog Shahbuhr [kird]}. Noldeke, trans. 42 n.
2, was skeptical, and thought that Wandew-Sabur "Acquired by Shabur'' was
the true form, eventually yielding Gondeshabur and the Arabised form
Jundaysabur; but Mr F. C. de Blois tells me that he is in turn skeptical of
Noldeke's theory, since "Acquired by Sabur" would be ‘Windad
Shahbuhr. D. T. Potts has recently discussed the etymology of the place's name
in the light of two Greek inscriptions found at Susa which mention a local
river Gondeisos, and has suggested that the name of this river derives from a
military center and fortress there of the Parthian period, *Gond-dez,
subsequently called *Gond-dez-i Shabur when the Sasanid ruler restored and
refounded it. The alternative name * Weh az Andiyog Shahbuhr would have been
applied to it when the people from Antioch were planted there. See his
"GundeSapur and the Gondeisos," 323-35. Al-Dlnawari, al-Akhbai
al-tiwal, 46, has the cryptic information that, in al-khuziyyah (i.e., the
local language of Khuzistan), the town was called N.y.lat, now rendered by the
people there as N.y.lab. Under the Sasanids, Gondeshabur flourished as the main
urban center of Khuzistan. In early Islamic times it was famed as a center of
medical knowledge and practice, skills that must have been brought thither in
Sasanid times by Nestorian Christians. See Noldeke, trans. 41 n. 2; Yaqut,
Buldan, II, 170-71; Le Strange, Lands, 238; Schwarz, Iran im Mittelalter,
346-50; Barthold, Historical Geography, 187-88; Frye, "The Political
History of Iran under the Sasanians," 126; El 2 s.v. Gondeshapur (Cl.
Huart and Aydin Sayili). On the improbability of Indian influence there, cf. n.
180 below.
Al-Tabari does not actually mention the building of what
was Shabur's most
favored urban foundation, that of Bishapur to the west of
Is^akhr, probably com-
pleted by him ca. 266. As at Gondeshabur and at Shushtar
(see on this last n. 94
below), Roman prisoners of war are said to have been settled
there. Many buildings of the Sasanid and Islamic period remain on the site,
although by the tenth century the town was in ruins, eclipsed by the rising
town of Kazarun. Also notable are the nearby reliefs carved at Shabur's behest
on the bank of the Tang-i Chawgan river. See Herrmann, The Iranian Revival,
101-104; Eh, s.v. BiSapur (E. J. Keall).
94. This dam, popularly known as the Band-i Qay?ar
"Emperor's dam" from the
alleged, but probably legendary, role of the captured
Roman ruler in building it
(although Roman prisoners of war were very probably
involved in this work, as also at the monuments of BIshabur; cf. Christensen,
Sassanides, 220-21, and Nina
Garsoian, "Byzantium and the Sasanians," 581),
came to be regarded as one of the
wonders of the world by the mediaeval Muslims. It was in
reality only one of many shadurwans on the Dujayl or Karun, barriers that
divided up the river's waters into irrigation channels running off from the
main flow and that at the same time relieved the pressure of waters in winter and
spring from the snows that fell in the
Holders of Power after Ardashlr b. Babak
3i
Sabur took from al-Riyanus a great financial indemnity, and set
him free after cutting off his nose; others, however, say that
Sabur
killed him. 95
Now there was, facing Takrit 96 and between the Tigris and Euphrates,
a city called al-Iiadr (Hatra), 97 and there was there a man Zagros Mountains,
where the Karun and its affluents rise.
Tustar (Persian, Shus(h}tar) was in early Islamic times
the next most important
town of Khuzistan after the provincial capital al-Ahwaz,
and was situated on the
Karun,- but its pre-Islamic history goes back at least to
the time of Pliny (first
century a.d.), who mentions it. See Yaqut, Bulddn, n,
29-3 1; Le Strange, Lands;
Markwart-Messina, Catalogue of the Provincial Capitals,
97; El 2 , s.v. Shushtar ( J. H. Kramers-C. E. Bosworth).
The term shadurwan has many meanings in early Islamic
usage, often in con-
nection with irrigation devices, but the basic meaning
seems to be that of a raised
platform or dais, this being then extended to masonry
walls and revetments for
storing and controling waters and their flow. E.
Benveniste thought that this obvi-
ously Iranian word was probably Parthian in origin. See
his "Le sens du mot persan shadurv&n," 31-37; Bosworth,
"Some Remarks on the Terminology of Irrigation Practices and Hydraulic
Constructions in the Eastern Arab and Iranian Worlds in the Third-Fifth
Centuries a.h.," 83-84.
95. Nothing definite is known of Valerian's death. The
Byzantine historian
Agathias (who derived much of his information on the
Sasanids from the inter-
preter Sergius, who had been given access to the Persian
royal annals while in the
Persian capital on diplomatic work) says that Shabur, a
notoriously bloodthirsty
monarch, had Valerian flayed alive, but this is
unconfirmed elsewhere. See Averil
Cameron, "Agathias on the Sassanians," 120-21,
138.
96. Reading bi-hiyal as in Noldeke's text, whereas he had
in his translation, 33,
followed a defective reading, bi-jibal. There are, of
course, no hills, let alone
mountains, near Takrit, lying as this town does on the
Tigris; see EP, s.v.Takrit ( J. H. Kramers and C. E. Bosworth).
97. The city of Hatra, Greek Atrai, lay to the southwest
of Maw$il on the Nahr
Tharthar, an affluent of the Tigris, but even by early
Islamic times the exact site
was not known to the Arabs. In the Parthian period, Hatra
was the center of one of
a chain of Arab principalities along the fringes of the
Syrian Desert through Commagene and Edessa to Emesa and Palmyra, but was
clearly under considerable Iranian political and cultural influence.
Various of its princes bore Iranian names, such as the
typically Parthian one of Sanatruk (which may be behind the Arabic name of the
ruler given here, al-Safirun; for suggestions on the etymology of the name
Sanatriik itself, see Eilers, "Iran and Mesopotamia," 491 n. 3) and that
of Vologases, and Hatra was usually an ally of the Arsacids against Roman
pressure.
With the fall of its Parthian protectors, Hatra declined
in power. It passed tem-
porarily under Roman control, bringing down on it the
wrath of Shapur I in the
middle years of the third century, as related here
(other, less likely, dates for this
are given in Arabic sources other than al-Tabari).
Hatra became famed in early Islamic lore as a symbol of
the transience of earthly
power, since it seemed by then to have disappeared from
the face of the earth, and
the story of the city's betrayal by al-I?ayzan's daughter
al-Na<Jirah struck the
popular imagination. It must have entered into Arabic
literature either through Ibn
3 *
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
from the Jaramiqah 98 called al-Satirun. He is the person about
whom Abu Du’ad al-Iyadl speaks : 99
I see how death has come down from al-Hadr upon the leader of
its people, al-Satirun.
The Arabs, however, called him al-Dayzan . 100 It is said that he
was a man from the people of Ba Jarma, but according to Hisham b.
[Muhammad] al-Kalbl, he was an Arab from Quda'ah, his genealogy
being al-Dayzan b. Mu'awiyah b. al-'Abld b. al-Ajram b. 'Amr
b. al-Nakha' b. Salih b. Hulwan b. 'Imran b. al-Hafi b. Quda'ah,
that his mother Jayhalah was from the tribe of Tazid b. Hulwan
al-Muqaffa"s Arabic version of the Khwaday-namag or
through the traditions
transmitted by Ibn al-Kalbi, and here utilized by
al-Tabari, based inter alia on
references in the verses of the poets of al-HIrah, Abu
Du’ad al-Iyadi, and 'Adi b.
Zayd. As Yarshater has noted, "Iranian National
History," 400-401, intriguing
anecdotes and touches like this may have evolved to provide
an element of entertainment within the narratives of dynastic and political
history. See Noldeke,
trans. 33 n. 4; PW, VII/2, s.v. Hatra (M. Streck);
Christensen, Sassanides, 218-19; F. Altheim and R. Stiehl, Die Aiabei in der
alten Welt, II, I9iff., IV, 263ff.j Eilers,
"Iran and Mesopotamia," 490-9 1; Bosworth,
"Iran and the Arabs before Islam,"
594-96; EP-, s.v. al-Hadr (Ch. Pellat).
98. That is, from the inhabitants of Ba Jarma, Syriac
Be(th) Garme, the region to
the east of the middle Tigris and of Takrit, lying south
of the Lesser Zab and the
region of Adiabene; it extended to Shahrazur and the
fringes of the Zagros range. As an important Christian region in Sasanid times,
it was the seat of a metropolitan bishopric. Arabic Jaramiqah, sing. Jarmaqi,
derives from Syriac Garmaqaye. See Noldeke, trans. 35 n. i; Marquart, EranSahr,
21-22; Fiey, Assyrie chrdtienne, III, n-145; Morony, Iraq after the Muslim
Conquest, 335-36.
99. Pre-Islamic poet of al-HIrah, floruit in the middle
years of the sixth century
under the Lakhmid al-Mundhir Id; he was classed among the
muqillun, those
poets who only composed a small amount of verse. This
verse is given in G. E. von Grunebaum, "Abu Du’ad al-Iyadl. Collection of
Fragments," as one of a fragment of thirteen verses. See on the poet, Abu
al-Faraj al-Isfaham, Kitab al-AghanP • XVI, 373-81; Rothstein, Lahmiden, 28,
133; Blachere, Histoire de la literature arabe, II, 294-95; EP-, s.v. Abu Du’ad
al-Iyadi (Ch. Pellat).
100. Noldeke, trans. 35 n. 1, nevertheless thought that
al-Satirun and Payzan
were two separate persons: the first name a non-Arabic
one [see n. 97 above), and
the second one Arabic, and averred that the only sure
name of a king of Hatra that
we know is the Barsemias/Barsemios, a clearly Aramiac
name, in Herodian, which he interpreted as Barsamya but which von Gutschmid,
"Bemerkungen zu Tabari's Sasanidengeschichte," 735, preferred to read
as Barsenios - Barsln. Noldeke surmised that the Dayzan mentioned here might
possibly have been the founder of the Payzanabadh/Tayzanabadh of al-Baladhun,
Futuh, 284, and likewise connected with the Marj al-Dayazin on the middle Euphrates
near al-Raqqah of Yaqut, Buldan, V, 101.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
33
and that he was exclusively known by his mother's name. 101 Ibn
al-Kalbi goes on to assert that he was the ruler over the land of
al-
Jazlrah and that he had with him [as his supporters] innumerable
numbers of the Banu 'Abld b. al-Ajram and [other] tribes of
Quda’ah. [It is said that] his kingdom stretched as far as Syria.
When Sabur, son of Ardashir, was away in the region of
Khurasan, al-Dayzan made an incursion into the Sawad. When
Sabur got back from his period of absence, he was told what al-
Dayzan had been up to. 'Amr b. Ilah (?) b. al-Judayy b. al-Daha’ b.
Jusham b. Hulwan b. 'Imran b. al-Hafi b. Quda'ah composed these
verses in connection with al-Dayzan's actions: 102
We encountered them [in battle] with a host of the [Banu] 'Ilaf
and with [a troop of] strong-hoofed stallions.
The Persians received at our hands exemplary punishment, and
we massacred the Herbadhs of Shahrazur. 103
We advanced toward the Persians | al-A'ajim ) from afar with a
host from al-Jazirah as in a blaze of fire. 104
When Sabur was informed about what al-Dayzan had done, he
headed towards him until he halted before al-Dayzan's fortress,
while al-Dayzan entrenched himself within it. Ibn al-Kalbi asserts
that Sabur was involved in the siege of the fortress for four
years,
completely unable to destroy it or to get his hands on al-Dayzan.
101. That is, as Ibn Jayhalah; cf. al-Baladhuri, Futuh,
284.
102. Ndldeke, trans. 39 n. 1, was skeptical about the
contemporaneity of this
poet with the events alluded to and thought that the
(later) author must have had
al-A'sha's verses in mind. In Abu al-Faraj al-I$fahani,
AghdnP - II, 142-43, giving
the story of Sabur's destruction of al-Hadr, the poet's
name appears as 'Amr b.
Alah.
103. The place-name Shahrazur in western Kurdistan,
though admittedly a
place with a pre-Islamic history (see EP ,s.v. Shahrazur
(V. Minorsky-C. E.
Bosworth), gives little sense in this context. Noldeke,
trans. 36 n. 3, endeavoring to improve the reading of these verses from parallel
sources, opined that the reading Bahiasii - Bih Ardashir (cf. al-Tabari, 1 ,
820, p. 16 above) of Abu al-Faraj al-I$faham, Aghani l ‘ II, 37 (wrongly
corrected to Shahiazui in Aghani 3 ?) was certainly the right one. It
undoubtedly makes more sense that Zoroastrian priests, herbeds, should be
encountered in the central Mesopotamian plain than in the mountains of
Kurdistan.
104. Following Noldeke's suggestion, loc. cit., that one
should follow the reading of Abu al-Faraj al-I$faham, Aghani 1 > mil-jazirati,
for the text's ka-al-jazirati.
34
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
However, al-A'sha Maymun b. Qays 105 has mentioned in his
poem that Sabur was engaged in the siege of the fortress for only
two years, saying:
Have you not seen al-Hadr, whose people always enjoyed ease of
life? But does anyone favored with ease of life enjoy it for
ever?
Shahabur of the Hosts (al-Junud) remained before it for two
years, wielding his battle axes there.
But his (i.e., the ruler of al-HIrah's) Lord vouchsafed him no
access of strength, and pivots such as his could not remain
firm (i.e., the ease of life he had enjoyed could not endure
forever).
When his Lord saw what he was doing, He swept down on him
[829] with a violent blow, without him being able to retaliate.
He had called upon his partisans, "Come forward to your
affair, which has been already severed,
And die noble deaths through your own swords; I see that the
real warrior takes on for himself the burden of death with
equanimity. " 1 06
One of al-Dayzan's daughters, called al-Nadlrah, 107 was menstruous,
hence was segregated in the
outer suburb of the city, as
was the custom of the time with women during their menstrual
periods. According to what was generally acknowledged, she was
one of the most beautiful women of her time, just as Sabur was
one of the most handsome men of his age. The two of them saw
each other, and fell madly in love with each other. She sent a
105. Here giving the full name of the poet (on whom see
n. 106, below) in order
to distinguish him from several Arabic poets with the
cognomen al-A'sha "the
night-blind one."
106. R. Geyer, Gedichte von Abu Maimi in ibn Qais
al-’A'shd, Arabic text
33-34, poem no. 4, w. 60-65. F° r this mukhadzam poet (d.
after 3/625) who
frequented the Lakhmid court at al-Hirah in the early
part of his life, see Rothstein, Lahmiden, 2i> Siddiqi, Studien iibez die
persische Fzezndwdztez, 77; Blachfcre, Histoize de la littezatuze aiabe, II,
321-25; EP, s.v. al-A'sha, Maymun b. Kays (W. Caskel). Noldeke, trans. 37 n. 4,
pointed out that there is no mention— at least, in this fragment of what was
probably a longer poem— of Dayzan and his daughter al- Nadirah's treachery; the
verses merely stress the well-worn theme of the fragility and perishability of
human endeavor.
107. In al-DInawari, al-Akhbaz al-fiwal, 48, she is
called Mulaykah.
Holders of Power after Ardashlr b. Babak
35
message to him with the words, "What would you give me if I
were to indicate to you how you could bring about the destruction
of the wall of this city and how you could kill my father?" He
replied, "Whatever you might choose; and I would elevate you
above all my other wives and would make you my closest spouse
to their exclusion." She instructed him, "Take a
silver-colored
collar dove, and write on its leg with the menstrual blood of a
blue-eyed virgin girl. Then release it, and it will alight on the
city
wall, and the latter will crumble away ." 108 That was in fact
the
talisman of the city, and only this could destroy the city. So
Sabur
did that and got ready to attack them (sc., the city's defenders).
The king of al-Hadr's daughter went on to say, "I will give
the
guards wine, and when they are laid out on the ground [by its
stupefying effects], kill them and enter the city ." 109 He
did all
this,- the city's defenses collapsed totally, and he took it by
storm
and killed al-Dayzan on that very day. The splinter groups from
Quda'ah, who were with al-Dayzan, were annihilated, so that no
part of them known as such remains to this present day. Some
clans of the Banu Hulwan 110 were likewise completely destroyed.
'Amr b. Ilah, who was with al-Dayzan, has said:
Have you not been filled with grief as the reports come in about
what has happened to the leading men of the Banu ’Abid,
And of the slaying of [al-] Dayzan and his brothers, and of the
108. In many premodem societies, menstrual blood has been
regarded as pos-
sessing special power, in certain cases for healing but
more often for wreaking
violent and harmful effects,- whence the taboos that
usually surround menstruous
women and the menstrual flow and which often cause them
to be separated from
the rest of the community at times of menstruation (as
was the case here with al-
Nadirah, see above). Pliny the Elder wrote in his Natural
History, Book XXVIII.
XXm. 77, "Over and above all this there is no limit
to women's power . . . Wild
indeed are the stories told of mysterious and awful power
of the menstruous
discharge itself . . (tr. Rackham, VII, 55).
Here, the violent effect, the shock to the order of
nature that spontaneously
brings about the destruction of the walls of Hatra,
arises from the passage of
unclean menstrual blood from the pure virgin to the pure
dove and its consequent
supernatural effect.
109. Noldeke, trans. 38 n. 4, notes that this additional
explanation for the fall of
the city is superfluous, given the magical effect of the
dove smeared with men-
strual blood, and must be an attempt at a rationalizing
explanation of events.
110. Hulwan was the great-grandson of Quda'ah; see Ibn
al-Kalbl-Caskel-
Strenziok, Jamharat al-nasab, I, Table 279, n, 331.
36
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
men of Tazid, who were wont to ride forth in the cavalry
squadrons?
Sabur of the Hosts attacked them with war elephants, richly
caparisoned, and with his heroic warriors,
And he destroyed the stone blocks of the fortress's columns,
whose foundation stones were like iron blocks. 111
Sabur then reduced the city to ruins and carried off al-Dayzan's
daughter al-Nadirah, marrying her at 'Ayn al-Tamr. 112 It is mentioned
that she complained volubly
the whole night through
about the hardness of her bed, even though this was of finely
woven silk cloth stuffed with raw silk. A search was made for
what was distressing her, and behold, it turned out to be a myrtle
[830] leaf stuck in one of the folds of the skin of her abdomen
which was
irritating her. 113 [Ibn al-Kalbi] goes on to relate: Because her
skin
was so fine, one could see right to her marrow. Sabur thereupon
said to her, "Tell me then, what did your father give you to
eat?"
She replied, "Cream, marrow from bones and honey from virgin
bees, together with the choicest wine!" He exclaimed, "By
your
father! I have known you more recently than your father, and am
dearer to you than him, who gave you such food as you
mention!"
(i.e., you should not therefore start complaining). So he commanded
a man to mount a wild, unbroken horse; he tied her locks
of hair to its tail, and then made the horse gallop off 1 14 until
it tore
her into pieces.
hi. These verses are also given in Abu al-Faraj
al-Isfahanl, AghanP’ II, 142-43;
al-Mas'udl, Muruj, TV, 85 - § 1411 (three verses); Yaqut,
Buldan, II, 268-69.
Noldeke, trans. 39 n. i, doubted very much the
authenticity of Arabic poetry from
so early a period.
1 12. This was a tassuj or administrative subdistrict to
the west of the Euphrates
and south of Hit on the Syrian Desert fringes,- the
settlement of 'Ayn al-Tamr "the
spring of the date palm" still had a small fortress
in al-Maqdisi's time (fourth/tenth
century), but the site has now disappeared. See Yaqut,
Buldan, IV, 176-77; Le
Strange, Lands, 65, 8i; Musil, The Middle Euphrates,
41-41, 28s, 289-90, 295-
31 1. For the term tassuj, see EP-, s.v. Tassudj (M. J.
Morony), and the remarks on
Sasanid administrative geography in n. 1 17 below.
1 13. This folkloric motif turns up in Hans Christian
Andersen's story of "The
Princess and the Pea." Cf. Christensen, "La
princess sur la feuille de myrte et la
princesse sur la poie," 241-57.
1 14. For this verb istarkada, see Glossarium, p. cclxix.
Noldeke, trans. 39 n. 4,
compared al-Nadirah's fate with the (apparently
authentic) account of the death of
the Merovingian queen Brunhilda, dragged to her death at
a horse's tail in 613, as
narrated by the chronicler Fredegar.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
37
A poet has said in connection with this:
The fortress has become desolate on account of [al-] Nadlrah,
likewise al-Mirba' because of her and the banks of the
Tharthar . 115
The poets have written extensively about this (al-] Dayzan in
their verse. 'Adi b. Zayd alludes to him in his words : 116
And [where is now] the ruler ( akhu } of al-Hadr, who once built
it and for whom the taxation of the Tigris and the Khabur
was collected?
He raised it up firmly with marble and covered it over with
plaster, yet the birds have found nesting places in its
pinnacles.
The blows of ill fortune did not frighten him, yet kingly power
ebbed away from him and his portals are now forsaken.
It is also said that Sabur built in Maysan (the town of] Shadh
Sabur, which is called in Aramaic ( al-naba\iyydh) Dima . 117
115. This verse is in fact by 'Adi b. Zayd (see n. 1 16
below) and is included in the collected Diwan 'Adi b. Zayd al-'Ibadi, ed.
al-Mu'aybidi, 13s, fragment no. 67. The Tharthar river flowed past al-Hadr, and
al-Mirba' ("place with vegetation from spring rains") must have been
a local site.
1 16. 'Adi b. Zayd, of Tamiml origin, flourished in the
second half of the sixth
century as the most notable exponent of the Hiran school
of poets, in whom the
indigenous Arabic, the Christian culture of the 'Ibid
and, probably, Persian cul-
ture, all combined. Hence ‘Adi's poetry mingles Christian
and Biblical themes
with the ascetic and fatalist strains of desert life. His
administrative career was
spent in the Persian capital Ctesiphon as a translator
and advisor on Arab affairs for Khusraw Abarwez and, after 580, at al-Hirah
with al-Nu'man in, till the jealousies and intrigues of his enemies brought
about his death ca. 600, as detailed by al- Tabari, I, 1016-24, pp. 339-si
below. His complete Diwan has not survived and only scattered verses are known.
See Rothstein, Lahmiden, 109-11? Siddiqi, Studien iibei die peisische
Fremdworter, 76-77-, Blachfere, Histoiie de la littiratuxe aiabe, n, 300-301?
EP, s.v. 'Adi b. Zayd (F. Gabrieli).
These famous verses by 'Adi on the lost glories of
al-Hadr are from the long poem
in the Diwan, ed. al-Mu'aybidi, 88, fragment no. 16.
1 17. Shadh Sabur was both a town and a kurab or
administrative district in
Maysan, the later Islamic administrative division of Ard
Kaskar? see Morony, Iraq after the Muslim Conquest, 155. Marquart suggested
that the place's full name might have been Erin-shad Shabuhr "the joy of
the Iranians (is] Shibur"? see Markwart-Messina, Catalogue of the
Provincial Capitals, 102. The local nabatf name of Dima (in the Cairo text, the
equally incomprehensible Rima) remains obscure.
38
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
In the time of Sabur, there arose Mani the Zindlq . 118
It is said that, when Sabur proceeded to the site of Junday Sabur
in order to lay down the city's foundations, he came across an aged
man there called Bil. So he asked him, "Is it permissible for
a city
to be constructed on this spot?" Bil replied, "If I am
vouchsafed
the ability to write, despite my having reached an advanced age,
then it is allowable for you to build a city in this place."
Sabur said
to him, "Now indeed, the two things whose possibility you deny
shall come to pass," and he thereupon sketched out the plan of
the
city and handed Bil over to an instructor, with instructions to
teach him to write and to be able to do arithmetical calculations
within one year. The instructor shut himself up with Bil, and
began by shaving off Bil's hair and his beard, lest these two
things
distract him, and then taught him thoroughly. After this, he
brought Bil to the king, Bil having bcome effective and skillful in
his studies. So Sabur entrusted to him the job of calculating expenditure
on the city and of setting up a proper accounting procedure
for these payments. The king established the region (i.e., of the
city and its surrounding rural areas) as a separate administrative
division ( kurah ) 119 and called it Bih-az-Andiw-i Sabur, which
118. On the rise of Mani, son of Patik, and his movement
at this time, see G.
Widengren, "Manichaeism and Its Iranian
Background," 965-90. The founder of
the new faith actually stemmed, according to the much
later Islamic historian al-
Birunl, from Kutha to the south of Ctesiphon, on the
canal connecting the Tigris
and the Euphrates. In later Arabic lore, he appears as
Man! b. Fatik or Fattik; see
EP, s.v. Mani b. Fattik (C. E. Bosworth).
The term zindlq came to be applied in Sasanid times not
only to the Man-
ichaeans but also, subsequently, to the Mazdakites, while
in early Islamic times its
use was generalized to cover adherents of many heretical
movements, especially
within 'Abbasid Iraq, and as a general term of abuse for
any religious deviants. See G. Vajda, "Les zindiqs en pays d'Islam au
debut de la periode abbaside," 173-229,- F.
Gabrieli, "La «zandaqa» au I er sibcle
abbaside," 23-38; EP> s.v. Zindik (L. Massignon). Some older
authorities sought an etymology for zindlq in Aramaic zaddiqa "righteous
(one)" or even Greek, but more recently the view has been put forward that
it is an indigenous Iranian term, from MP zandik, a person who has a deviant
interpretation ( zand ) of the sacred text of the Avesta; hence early Armenian
writers contrast the zandlks with the orthodox Zoroastrian Magians. The
question remains open. See Sir Harold Bailey's Note appended to Widengren's
chapter, in CHI, m/2, 907; EP, s.v. Zindik (F. C. de Blois), opting for an
Aramaic origin.
1 19. For this term, probably stemming from Greek chord,
see EP, s.v. Kura (D.
Sourdel). It denoted something like an administrative
division within a province
(Fars, for instance, having within it five kiirahs in
Sasanid and early Islamic times), the equivalent, according to Yaqut, quoting
Hamzah al-Isfahanl, of the Persian
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
39
means "the city of Sabur's which is better than Antioch
." 120 This
is the city that is [now] called Junday Sabur, which the people of
al-Ahwaz, however, call Bil, from the name of the man who was
overseer of the city's construction . 121
When Sabur was near to death, he appointed as ruler his son
Hurmuz and laid upon him testamentary instructions, ordering
him to base his conduct upon them. There are differing views on
the length of Sabur's reign. Some authorities put it at thirty
years
and fifteen days, others at thirty-one years, six months, and nine-
teen days . 122
istan/ustan, and was itself divided up into component
tassujs and rustaqs. F.
Lokkegaard, Islamic Taxation in the Classic Period, with
Special Reference to
Circumstances in Iraq, 164-67, assumed a descending order
of istan/kurah —
tassuj — rustdq — dih/qaryah for the hierarchy of
administrative subdivisions in
Sasanid Mesopotamia and Persia and these same lands
during early Islamic times,
but the texts are, however, inconsistent and at times
contradictory. The Sirat
Anusharwan | see on this n. 624 below) posits, in the
context of Khusraw Anushar's administrative and fiscal reforms (see al-Tabari,
I, 960-63, pp. 255-62 below) a hierarchy of province or region ( balad ),
administrative division (kurah),
rural district [rustdq), village ( qaryah ), down to
individual taxpayer, and this corresponds largely to how al-Tabari, I, 814, pp.
3-5 above, describes Ardashir I's origins. See Noldeke, trans. 446-47 Excursus
3; Wadie Juwaideh, The Introductory Chapters ofYaqut’s Mu'jam al-Buldan, 56,
57-58; Valeria F. Piacentini, "Madina/ shahr, qarya/dih, ndhiy a/ rustdq.
The city as pohtical-administrative institution: the continuity of a Sasanian
model," 96-99; and above all, the detailed discussion of G. Widengren,
"Recherches sur le feudalisme iranien," 122-48.
120. See nn. 58, 93 above.
121. This tale of Bll's educational achievement revolves
round learning the
notoriously difficult and ambiguous Pahlavi script.
122. Shabur I's reign was 240-70, since he was crowned as
coruler with his
father Ardashir I in 240, probably in April of that year,
almost two years before the latter's death; see the discussion on the regnal
dates of Shabur by Kettenhofen in his Die romisch-persischen Kriege des 3.
fahrhunderts nach Chi., 46-49. Shabur's name appears on his coins as SHPWHRY -
Shabuhr. See on his coins Paruck, Sasanian Coins, 52-53, 316-22, 416-19, Plates
IV-V, Table II; Gobi, Sasanian Numismatics, 43, Table n, Plate 2; Sellwood,
Whitting, and Williams, An Introduction to Sasanian Coins, 21, 79-83; Malek,
"A Survey of Research on Sasanian Numismatics," 233.
The other Arabic sources on his reign include Ibn
Qutaybah, Ma'drif, 654 (brief
entry); al-Ya'qubi, Ta’rikh, I, 180-81 (brief note of
Sabur's Roman campaign, but
mainly concerned with the appearance of Mani, the
polemical works he composed, and Sabur's own attraction to Manichaeism before
he was brought back to al- majusiyyah by the Chief Mobadh); al-DInawari,
al-Akhbar al-^iwal, 46 (only a short notice, on Sabur's Roman campaign and capture
of the Roman emperor, and his construction works in Khuzistan and at
Jundaysabur); al-Mas'udi, Muruj, n, 163-66 - §§589-93 (Mani's rise to
prominence and Sabur's part in it, together with
40
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
[Hurmuz I]
Then after Sabur (I), son of Ardashir (I), son of Babak,
the royal
power was assumed by his son Hurmuz (I ). 123
He was called "the Bold" ( al-jari V 24 and
resembled Ardashir in
bodily constitution and appearance, but did not come up
to him in
judgment and skillful management . 125 Nevertheless, he
was out-
standing for his fortitude in battle, boldness, and
massive build.
His mother, according to what is said, was one of the
daughters
of King Mihrak, whom Ardashir killed at Ardashir Khurrah
. 126
This arose from the fact that Ardashir's astrologers had
told him
that a person would arise from Mihrak's stock who would
attain
the royal power. So Ardashir hunted down all of his stock
and
killed them. However, Hurmuz's mother, who was an
intelligent,
beautiful, perfectly formed, and physically strong
person, slipped
the latter's counsels on good rule and the maintenance of
an efficient army); idem,
Tanbih, ioo, trans. 144; Hamzah al-Isfahani, Ta'iikh,
44-45 (enumerates in fair
detail all the cities Sabur built, with their names and
comments on their plans); Ibn al-Athlr, Kamil, I, 385-88. Of Persian sources,
see Tabari-Bal'ami, trans. II, 75-85.
Shabur seems to have been a less zealous adherent of
Zoroastrianism than his
father, and is even said by some sources to have been
favorable toward Manichae-
ism, although Zoroastrianism was at this time being
consolidated as the state
religion of Persia through the untiring efforts of men
like the Chief Herbed Kerder. During his time, the influence in the state of
Kerder and the prophet Mani seems to have been evenly balanced. Shabur's
deportations from Antioch and elsewhere in Syria and in Upper Mesopotamia
actually brought increased numbers of Christians into the Persian Empire, so that
Christian communities were now implanted in the towns of the heartland Fars and
in places like Ardashir Khurrah, the preferred residence of Ardashir I. See
Labourt, Le Chiistianisme dans V empire perse, 19-20; Chaumont, "Les
Sassanides et la Christianisme de l'Empire iranien," 168-80; S. Brock,
"Christians in the Sasanian Empire: A Case of Divided Loyalties,"
iff.
For recent studies on Shabur's reign in general, see,
e.g., Christensen,
Sassanides, 179ft, 218-26; Frye, The Heritage of Persia,
208-17; idem, "The Political History of Iran under the Sasanians,"
124-27, 178; EP-, sw. Sasanids (M. Morony), Shapur (C. E. Bosworth).
123. In Pahlavi, Ohrmazd, Greek Hormisdes, from Ahura
Mazda, the name in
the Avesta of the great divinity of ancient Iranian
religion. See Justi, Namenbuch,
7— 9; Gignoux, Noms propres sassanides, no. 702; Elr,
s.v. Ahura Mazda (M. Boyce).
124. In al-Mas'udi, Muruj, n, 1 66 => §593, and
al-Khwarazmi, Mafatih al-'ulum,
102, we have for this al-batal "the warrior,
hero." Cf. Noldeke, trans. 43 n.2.
125. Noldeke, trans., 43 n. 3, observes that the forty
years or so from Shapur I's
death to the accession of Shapur II were ones of
comparative weakness and decline for the Sasanids.
126. See al-Tabari, I, 817, pp. 10-11 above.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
4i
away surreptitiously into the desert and took refuge with some
shepherds.
Now Sabur set out one day hunting. He pursued his quarry enthusiastically,
and became very thirsty. At that point, the tents
where Hurmuz's mother had sought refuge came into his view. He
made for them, but found the shepherds away. He asked for water,
and the woman there gave him some. He perceived that she was
outstandingly beautiful and had a remarkable carriage and a noble
face. Shortly afterward, the shepherds returned. Sabur asked them
about her, and since one of the shepherds gave out that she was a
member of his family, Sabur asked him to give her to him in
marriage. The shepherd conceded this to him, so Sabur went off
with her to his own encampment, commanded her to be washed
clean, suitably clothed, and adorned. He wanted to have conjugal
relations with her. But when he was alone wih her, and sought
from her what men usually seek from women, she held back and
fended him off when he tried to get near her, with a degree of
force
he found unpleasing, and he marveled at her physical strength.
When she behaved like this for some time, it aroused his anger,
and he enquired after the cause. So she told him that she was the
daughter of Mihrak, and that she had only done what she had done
in order to spare him from Ardashir. He made an agreement with
her to conceal her real position, and had sexual congress with her.
She then gave birth to Hurmuz, but Sabur subsequently concealed
the whole matter.
When Hurmuz was several years old, Ardashir rode out one day,
and turned aside to Sabur's dwelling because he wanted to tell
Sabur something. He went into the house unexpectedly. When
Ardashir had stretched himself out comfortably, Hurmuz came
forth, having by this time grown into a sturdy youth. He had in his
hand a polo stick that he was playing with, and was crying out in
pursuit of the ball. When Ardashlr's eye fell on him, this
perturbed
him, and he became aware of the resemblance in the youth to his
own family, because the qualities of Persian kingship ( al -
kayiyyah ) 127 characteristic of Ardashlr's house could not be -
127. An Arabic abstract noun coined from the name of the
ancient, at best
semilegendary, ruling dynasty of the Kayanids, Kay
(Avestan Kawi) being the
princely title used by these, passing into MP and NP with
the generalized sense of
42
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
concealed and could not be disregarded by anyone, because of
certain
specific traits visible in members of that house: a handsome face,
a
stout physique, and other bodily features by which Ardashlr's
house was distinguished. So Ardashir made him come near, and
asked Sabur about him. The latter fell down [before him] in obeisance,
acknowledging his fault over all that he had done, and told
his father the truth about the whole affair. Ardashir,
nevertheless,
expressed joy over him, and told him that he had now [for the first
time] realized the truth of what the astrologers had said regarding
Mihrak's offspring and regarding the one from them who would
reign as king; the astrologers had simply been envisaging Hurmuz
in this connection, since he was from the stock of Mihrak; and
this had now provided consolation for the perturbation in his
mind and had dispelled it.
When Ardashir died, and the royal power passed to Sabur, he
appointed Hurmuz governor of Khurasan and dispatched him
thither. Hurmuz adopted an independent policy, subdued the
rulers of the nations in adjacent lands, and behaved as a highly
proud and effective ruler. Hence various calumniators delated him
to Sabur and implanted the delusion in the latter's mind that, if
Sabur were to summon Hurmuz [to his court], the latter would not
respond, and that he was planning to seize the royal power from
him. News of this reached Hurmuz. It is said that he went aside
into a private place, and cut into his hand and severed it, placed
on
the hand some preservative, wrapped it up in a piece of costly
clothing, put it in a casket and sent it off to Sabur. He wrote a
letter to him about what he had heard (sc., the calumnies concerning
him),
and [explained] that he had
only done what he had done
(i.e., cut off and dispatched the hand) in order to dispel all
suspicions
about him, for among their customs was the practice of not
raising anyone to kingly power who had a physical defect. 128
When the letter and the accompanying casket reached Sabur, he
"king." See Christensen, Les Kayanides, 9-10,
17ft., 43; Yarshater, "Iranian Na-
tional History," 436ff. ; El 2 , s.v. Kayanids
(ed.).
128. Noldeke, trans. 45 n. 1, noted the information of
the Byzantine historian
Procopius that "a one-eyed person or someone
afflicted by any other serious defect, could not become king of Persia";
but this was probably a near-universal principle in the Ancient Near East and
the classical Eastern Mediterranean world, and was one of continued validity in
later times, since physical wholeness was certainly required for the Byzantine
emperors and the Islamic caliphs.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. fiabak 43
became cut up through grief, and wrote back to Hurmuz telling
him how filled with affliction he had become at Hurmuz's action,
excused himself and informed him that, if Hurmuz were to cut up
his body limb by limb, he would not choose anyone else for the
royal power. He then proclaimed him [his successor as] king.
It is said that, when Sabur placed the crown on Hurmuz's head,
the great men of state came into his presence and invoked blessings
on him. He returned a kindly answer to them, and they then
realized from him the [real] truth of the affair. He behaved benevolently
toward them, meted out justice to the subjects, and followed the
[praiseworthy] ways of his
forefathers, and he laid out
the district ( kuiah ) of Ram Hurmuz. 129 Hurmuz's reign lasted one
year and ten days. 130
[Bahiam I]
After him, there succeeded to the royal power his son Bahrain
(I). He was Bahram, son of Hurmuz [I], son of Sabur (I), son of
Ajdashlr (I), son of Babak. 131
129. A town of southeastern Khuzistan, in early Islamic
times a flourishing
market town and in the modem period a center for the oil
industry. It was clearly
an old town, though little mentioned by the historians.
The Pahlavi town list
confirms al-jabari's information here that it was founded
by Hormizd I, son of
Shabur I (Markwart-Messina, Catalogue of the Provincial
Capitals, 19, 95-96), but some sources, e.g., Hamzah al-I$fahani, 43, attribute
it to Ardashir I. See Marquart, EranSahr, 145; Le Strange, Lands, 243-44;
Schwarz, Iran, 332-35, Barthold, Historical Geography, 194, EP, sv. Ram-Hurmuz
(V. Minorsky and C. E. Bosworth).
130. Hormizd I Ardashlr's reign was 170-71, Hormizd's
name appears on his
coins as WHRMZDY. See on his coins Paruck, Sasanian
coins, 53, 322-23, 419,
Plate V, Table HI; G6bl, Sasanian Numismatics, 43, Table
n, Plate 3, Sellwood,
Whitting, and Williams, An Introduction to Sasanian
Coins, 21, 84-85, Malek, "A
Survey of Research on Sasanian Numismatics," 233.
The other Arabic sources on his reign include Ibn
Qutaybah, Ma'drif, 654, al-
Ya’qubl, Ta'tikh, I, 187 (extremely brief), al-Dinawari,
al-Akhbdt al-tiwdl, 47
(mainly on his execution of Mani, thus attributed to
Hurmuz); al-Mas'udi, Muruj,
n, 166-67 - §593 (his counsels to his commanders); idem,
Tanbih, roo, trans. 144,
Hamzah al-l§fahanl, 45 (notes his considerable gifts, but
that he fell short of his
father), Ibn al-Athlr, Kamil, I, 388-89. Of Persian
sources, see T a bari-Bal'ami,
trans. II, 85-89.
For recent studies on Hormizd's reign in general, see
Christensen, Sassanides,
ro2, 226-28; Frye, "The Political History of Iran
under the Sasanians," 127-28,
178; Morony, P, s.v. Sisanids.
1 31. MP Warahran, Wahram, Greek Ouararanes, Baramas,
etc., Syriac War-
athran, from the name of the Avestan god of victory
Varathraghna. See Ndldeke,
44 Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
[The History of al-Hirah]
After the demise of 'Amr b. 'Adi b. Nasr b. Rabi’ah, the governor
for Sabur b. Ardashir, and for Hurmuz b. Sabur, and for Bahram [b.
Hurmuz] b. Sabur, over the frontier region of [the land of] the
Arabs of Rabi’ah, Mudar, and the rest of the tribes in the deserts
of
Iraq, Hijaz, and Jazirah, 132 was at that time a son of 'Amr b.
'Adi
called Imru’ al-Qays al-Bad’. He was the first of the kings from
the
house of Nasr b. Rabi’ah and the governors for the kings of the
Persians who became a Christian. 133 According to what Hisham
b. Muhammad (sc., Ibn al-Kalbi) has mentioned, he ruled over his
charge as a vassal prince for 1 14 years, comprising twenty-three
years and one month under Sabur, son of Ardashir, one year and
trans. 46 n. 3; Justi, Namenbuch, 361-65; Gignoux, Noms
piopies sassanides, no.
926; Eli, s.v. Bahram, heading,
132. This enormous sphere of control and influence
attributed to the early
Lakhmid governors is vastly exaggerated, since their
authority as representatives
of imperial Persia was mainly exercised along the Syrian
Desert fringes of Meso-
potamia and in northeastern Arabia, and only sporadically
within the Arabian
interior. The two great tribal groups of Rabi'ah and
Mudar dominated northern
Arabia, with members of their component tribes pushing
northward through Iraq
into Jazirah, where the names of their dwelling places
and pasture grounds, the
Diyar of Rabi'ah, Mudar, and Bakr, reflect their presence
in early Islamic times. See EP, s.v. Rabi'a and Mudar (H. Kindermann). It was,
however, true that elements of the South Arabian Lakhm had spread from their
original home quite early in the pre-Islamic period not only into Iraq but also
into Syria. See Ibn al-Kalbl-CaskelStrenziok, Jamharat al-nasab, I, Tables 176,
246, n, 54-56, 375-76; EP, s.v. Lakhm (H. Lammens-Irfan Shahid).
133. al-Bad' , "the first, the originator."
This is Imru’ al-Qays (I), the famous
"Imru’ al-Qays, King of all the Arabs" of the
proto-Arabic al-Namarah tomb in-
scription of 328, al-Namarah being situated in the
district of al-§afa’ between
Damascus and Bosra in what was then the Roman province of
Arabia. In explana-
tion of the apparent paradox why this Lakhmid king in
al-Hirah should have been
buried far from his homeland of the desert fringes of
Iraq, Irfan Shahid has plausibly suggested that Imru’ al-Qays was the first of
his line to become a Christian and therefore deserted his allegiance to the
Zoroastrian Sasanids and went over to the Romans in Syria, becoming one of
their client rulers; also, he may have been affronted by Shabur ITs campaign against
the Arabs of eastern Arabia (see al- Tabari, I, 838-39, pp. 54-56 below), which
challenged his own claim to the headship of all the Arabs, however inflated
this might have been (see n. 232 above). Noldeke, tr. 47 n. 2, denied that
Imru’ al-Qays al-Bad’ could have been a Christian, in the light of the vigorous
paganism of later Lakhmid kings, and thought that al- Tabari's source Ibn
al-Kalbi had here confused this Imru’ al-Qays (I) with a later one of the same
name. But Noldeke was writing before the discovery of the Namarah inscription
in Syria at the end of the nineteenth century. See Shahid's detailed discussion
of the king and his inscription, in Byzantium and the Arabs in the Fourth
Century, 31-47, and also Rothstein, Lahmiden, 52, 55ff., 61, 63-64, 139.
Holders of Power after Ardashir b. Babak
45
ten days under Hurmuz, son of Sabur, and three years, three
months, and three days under Bahram, son of Hurmuz, son of
Sabur, and eighteen years under Bahram, son of Bahram, son of
Hurmuz, son of Sabur, son of Ardashir . 134
According to what has been mentioned, Bahram b. Hurmuz was
a forebearing and mild person, so that the people rejoiced when he
came to power. He behaved in a praiseworthy manner toward
them, and in his policy of rule over the people followed the practices
of his forefathers.
According to what has been mentioned, Mam the Zindlq summoned
him to his religion. So Bahram enquired exhaustively into
Mam's beliefs, and found that he was a propagandist for Satan. So
he ordered him to be executed and his body to be skinned and
stuffed with straw, and then for it to be hung from one of the city
gates of funday Sabur, which is [because of this] called Mani's
Gate. He also killed his followers and those who had joined his
faith . 135 Bahrain's reign lasted, according to what is said, for
three
years, three months, and three days . 136
134. A total, in reality, of forty-five years,
four-and-a-half months (but Shabur I's
reign is usually taken as thirty or thirty-one years, as
in al-Tabari, 831, p. 39
above). Also, Bahram I was the son of Shabur I, not of
Hormizd I, and Bahram II was the son of Bahram I, hence Hormizd I's nephew and
not his son.
135. The date of Mani's execution is controversial, and
its exact placing is
bound up with uncertainty over the chronology of the
early Sasanid rulers, see n.
S 6 above, and, specifically, with the dates for Bahram
I's brief reign, during which it appears Mani was killed. Hence the chronology
for the dating of Shabur I's death, Hormizd I's reign, Bahram I's reign, and
Bahram D's accession proposed by Henning is followed here (see nn. 122, 130 and
134 above, and nn. 136-37 below).
Basing himself on the dating of 27 1 -74 for Bahram I's
reign and on evidence from a wide range of sources, including Manichaean ones,
Henning suggested that Mani may have been executed on Monday, the 4th of the
Babylonian month of Addaru in the year 5 84 of the Seleucid era - 2 March a.d.
274; but he allowed the possibility of divergent dates, such as a date in a.d.
277 proposed by S. H. Taqizadeh. See Taqizadeh and Henning, "The dates of
Mani's Life," 505-20 and especially 515-20. See also for further
suggestions regarding the date, such as that of 276, W. Hinz,
"Mani and Karder," 490-92; Widengren,
"Manichaeism and Its Iranian Back-
ground," 971-72.
136. Bahram I's reign was 271-74, but very little is
known about his reign. His
name appears on his coins as WRtfR’N. See on his coins
Paruck, Sasanian Coins,
53 - 54 , 324-25 , 419-22, Plates V-VI, Table HI; GQbl,
Sasanian Numismatics, 43, Table n, Plate 3; Sellwood, Whitting, and Williams,
An Introduction to Sasanian Coins, 21, 86-87; Malek, "A Survey of Research
on Sasanian Numismatics," 233.
The other Arabic sources on his reign include Ibn
Qutaybah, Ma'arif, 655; al-
Ya'qubi, Ta'rikh, 1 , 182 (on his relations with Mani,
and his execution of him); al- Dinawari, al-Akhbar al-tfwdl, 47 (lists his name
only); al-Mas'udi, Murdj, n, 147-
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar