Tampilkan postingan dengan label BLACKMAGIC. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label BLACKMAGIC. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 01 Januari 2017

BLACK MAGIC WHITE SOLDIER PART 8

BLACK MAGIC WHITE SOLDIER ( THE YEAR 1666 PART 2 )




  Sabbatai Zevi arranged  to fulfill an interpretation of the prophecy of the Messiah whereby he was destined to marry an unchaste woman. During the Chmielnicki massacres in Poland, a Jewish orphan girl named Sarah, about six years old, was found by Christians and sent to a convent. After ten years, through some miracle, she escaped, and made her way to Amsterdam. She eventually went to Livorno where, according to some reports, she led a life of prostitution. She also conceived the notion that she was to become the bride of  the  Messiah, who was soon to appear. When the report of Sarah’s adventures reached Sabbatai, he claimed that such a consort had been promised to him in a dream, in   fulfillment of prophecy. He reportedly sent messengers   to Livorno to bring Sarah to him, and they were married. Through her, a new romantic and licentious element entered Sabbatai’s teachings.

  Passing through the city of Gaza, where there lived an important Jewish community, Sabbatai met   Nathan of Gaza, who professed to be the risen Elijah. In 1665, Nathan announced that the  Messianic age was to begin in the following year. Nathan helped explain Sabbatai’s sinning by suggesting that, from the beginning of time, the soul of the   Messiah was held captive in the realm of darkness. The  Messiah must therefore descend into sin to pull his soul from the darkness that held him captive. Sabbatai spread this announcement widely, together with many additional details to the effect that the world would be conquered by him and  Elijah, without bloodshed; that the  Messiah would then lead back the Ten  Lost Tribes to the Holy Land, “riding on a lion with a seven-headed  dragon in its jaws.” These types of messianic claims were then widely circulated and believed.

  Finally, after some hesitation, he publicly declared himself as the expected Messiah in, not accidentally, 1666. Accounts of his activities were exaggerated and spread among  Jews in Europe, Asia, and Africa. His popularity grew as people of other religions repeated his story as well. The  Messianic movement spread to  Italy, Germany, and the  Netherlands and the  Jews of Hamburg and Amsterdam heard about the events in Smyrna from Christians.  Menasseh’s coconspirator,  Queen Christina, became so fascinated with the claims of  Sabbatai Zevi that she nearly became a disciple. She danced in the streets of Hamburg with Jewish friends in anticipation of the apocalyptic event.24

  In Amsterdam, almost the entire Jewish community had become followers of  Sabbatai Zevi. A prominent member of  Sabbatai Zevi’s followers in Amsterdam was the very wealthy Abraham Pereyra, who had provided the main financial backing for the famous printing        and publishing enterprise as well as for the other varied intellectual activities of  Menasseh ben  Israel all over Europe. 25 The Jewish community of Amsterdam had been kept informed of the progress of Sabbatai’s mission through Peter  Serrarius, at whose home  Menasseh ben  Israel first shared his conviction in the immanent        advent of the Messiah. As soon as news reached Amsterdam about   Sabbatai Zevi,   Serrarius was publishing pamphlets in English and Dutch telling everyone about the signs of the messianic era and that the King of the  Jews had arrived. 26

  Serrarius, a leading  millenarian who was also a patron of the philosopher Baruch  Spinoza, had met frequently with  Kabbalistic thinkers at the synagogue in Amsterdam, and worked on  Gematria with them, seeking to determine when the Messiah would appear. 27 Among  Serrarius’ intimate  friends were John Dury,  Comenius, both of whom he was able to convince about the messiahship of  Sabbatai Zevi. 28 Serrarius was also in contact with the alchemist Franciscus Mercurius  van Helmont, author of the Alphabetum Naturale Hebraicum(1667), and the Christian  Kabbalist Christian Knorr  von Rosenroth, famous for his Kabbala Denudata. Van Helmont had served on a diplomatic mission on behalf of Elisabeth of  Bohemia, the daughter of  Elizabeth  Stuart and Frederich V of the  Palatinate who was living in Herford, Germany, when he met with  Henry More and Robert Boyle.  Serrarius was also  in contact with another acquaintance of  Menasseh, Henry Jessey, a founding member of the Puritan religious sect, who worked behind the scenes of the Whitehall Conference.  Serrarius sent regular reports to England, where the known millenarians associated with  Menasseh, like  Royal Society founder Henry  Oldenburg, as well as Puritan   millenarian Nathaniel Homes and Thomas Chappell and others anxiously awaited the latest news. 29

 Serrarius had also been   informing Jean de Labadie (1610–1674) on the progress of Sabbatai’s mission. Originally a Jesuit priest, Labadie became a member of the Reformed Church in 1650, before founding the community which became known as the Labadists in 1669. In 1672, de Labadie and his followers sought refuge with Elisabeth of  Bohemia. In 1676, Elisabeth also first met the son of Sir  William Penn,  William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania.   Penn became close friends with Elisabeth Stuart, celebrating her in the second edition of his book No Cross, No Crown. Penn, also a friend of John Dury, was a member of the Lantern, a circle around Rotterdam merchant Benjamin Furly, which included alchemists  van Helmont, Lady Conway,  Henry More and John Locke. Furly and van Helmont were also connected with a group of students of Jacob Boehme which included Serrarius and who also knew and associated with Spinoza. Furly, like Penn, was a Quaker and a close supporter of George Fox, the founder of the movement, which provided the guiding principles of new state of Pennsylvania.

  According to American Rosicrucian legend, their order was brought to America in 1694 under the leadership of Grand Master  Johannes Kelpius. Born in Transylvania, Kelpius was a follower of Johann Jacob Zimmerman, an avid disciple of   Jacob Boehme and who was referred to by German authorities as a “most learned astrologer, magician and cabbalist.” 30 It is likely that  Knorr von Rosenroth, the famous author of Kabbala Denudata, introduced Kelpius and Zimmermann. According to Kelpius’s biographer, Zimmermann was  also “intimately acquainted” with Benjamin Furly. 31 Answering Penn’s call to establish a godly country in his newly acquired American lands, Kelpius and  his followers crossed the Atlantic and established a colony in the valley of the  Wissahickon Creek in Philadelphia.

 At the beginning of the year 1666, Sabbatai left Smyrna for Istanbul as Nathan of Gaza had prophesied that Sabbatai would place the sultan’s crown on his own head. However, when the Sultan Mehmed IV was informed of his ambitions, Sabbatai was taken to Adrianople where the sultan’s physician, a former Jew, advised him to convert to  Islam. On the following day, on September 16, 1666, before the Sultan, Sabbatai removed his Jewish attire and donned a Turkish turban on his head as a symbol of his conversion to Islam. The sultan is said to have been very pleased and rewarded Sabbatai by conferring the title Effendi and appointed him as his doorkeeper with a high salary. Despite the immense disappointment experienced by  Jews across the world, Zevi’s conversion was positively received by many  Jews who had been hiding their Jewish identity as a result of the Spanish expulsion of 1492, like the  Marranos or  Conversos, and other crypto- Jews. Numerous secret societies of  Sabbateans developed particularly in Eastern Poland at the end of the seventeenth century. The Polish rabbis attempted to ban the “ Sabbatean heresy” in 1722, but could not fully succeed, as it was widely popular among the Jewish middle class.

  Viewing Zevi’s apostasy as a sacred mystery, some of Zevi’s followers in  Ottoman Turkey imitated his conversion to  Islam. Sarah and a number of Sabbatai’s followers also converted to  Islam. About 300 families converted and came to be known as  Dönmeh, from a Turkish word meaning “convert.” They practiced  Islam outwardly though secretly keeping to their  Kabbalistic doctrines. The  Dönmeh community was localized in  Salonika, in   Ottoman  Greece, which by the time of Sabbatai Zevi’s mission was renowned as a haven for  Conversos and as a center of  Kabbalah and rabbinic scholarship. It was described by one writer as “the only Jewish city in Europe (aside from Warsaw).”32

  The  Dönmeh maintained associations with a number of Sufi   orders. This is largely based on the contention that Zevi’s exile into the Balkans brought him into close contact with several forms of heterodox  S u fi     s m in the region. Salonika was also known for its  Sufis,  like the followers of the path of Mevlana, Jalal ad-Din   Rumi, known as the  Mevlevi, made famous for their Whirling Dervishes. The   Dönmeh became actively involved with the  Mevlevi. Some alleged similarities between  Dönmeh and unorthodox     Sufi practice seem  to exist, including the violation of Halal, sexual taboos, ecstatic singing, mystical  interpretations of sacred scripture, and the practice of ritual meals.

  Sabbatai Zevi incorporated both Jewish tradition and  Sufism into his  theosophy and, in particular, was to have been initiated into the  Bektashi  Sufi order,      which long had associations with the Dönmeh.33 The Order was founded in the thirteenth century by the Persian saint, Haji Bektash Veli. They were found particularly throughout Anatolia and the Balkans among a  Shia community known as the Alawis, who believe in a trinity of Allah, Muhammad, and Ali, whom they regard, along with Haji Bektash Veli, as the  “Perfect Human Being,” the Primordial man of the  Sufis .      Bektashi doctrines  are derived from the  Kabbalah . 34The  Bektashis incorporated  Kabbalistic doctrines of letter and number symbolism that linked devotion to the divinity of Ali with beliefs in anthropomorphism, the manifestation of God in human form and reincarnation. Their beliefs also comprise a syncretism of   shamanism, Buddhism , Manichaeism,  Christianity , and  Neoplatonism . Bektashism is also heavily permeated with  Shia concepts, such as the veneration of Ali, and the  Twelve Imams. 35 They had a secret doctrine revealed only to initiates that  involves contempt for Muhammed, the founder of  Islam. 36 The  Bektashis  ignore most conventional Islamic rules, such as abstention from alcohol and pork, the veiling of women and the requirement to face Mecca when praying. 37

  When  Sabbatai Zevi would visit Constantinople he became “accustomed to living in a dervish monastery,” Gershom   Scholem wrote, “[a]nd it can hardly be doubted that there were early secret ties between the order of the  Bektashi  and the  Dönmeh.” Also according to  Scholem:

  It is known that among the  Bektashi orders the doctrine of takiye (dissimulation) was widely practiced; it permitted the adherents of even radical mystical heresies in  Islam to appear to the outside world as a wholly orthodox segment of the Sunni community in order to avoid persecution. It is also known that their enemies always claimed this duplicity of the  Bektashi and accused them of it. Often they also added the even more far-reaching accusation that the  Bektashi, or at least certain of their subgroups, secretly subscribed to a religious nihilism.  Now it is just this theory and practice of takiyewhich, though here for purely internal Jewish reasons, determined the  Dönmeh’s way of life in which the external appearance stood in radical contradiction to what they taught and stood for. Their common status as a mystical heresy with often extreme aberrations was bound to create sympathy between these two groups. Perhaps it is also no accident that the cemetery of the most extreme group of the  Dönmeh, with the grave of its leader Baruchya Russo (in  Islam: Osman Baba), was located in the immediate vicinity of the  Bektashi monastery of  Salonika. According to  Dönmeh tradition, moreover, aside from several groups of  Sabbatean families which still later joined them from Poland, a number of Turkish and Greek nonJewish families also passed over and joined one of their subsects. 3






THE ILLUMINATI


  As explained by Joscelyn Godwin, a leading historian of the occult traditions of the nineteenth century, “Conspiracy theory is anathema to the historian, but indispensable to the history of occultism.” 1 And no name is more firmly associated with “conspiracy theory” than the notorious Illuminati, who came to prominence with the assistance of the powerful Rothschild family, who were pivotal to the rise of banking and Europe as a colonial power.

  In 1603, King James I negotiated the Treaty of London, ending the conflict with Spain. England’s attention shifted from attacking the colonial interests of other nations to establishing overseas colonies of its own. Thus, the British Empire began consolidating itself during the early seventeenth century, with the British settlement of North America and the smaller islands of the Caribbean, and the establishment of private companies, most notably the English East India Company, to administer colonies and overseas trade. The growing power of England in the eighteenth century was largely attributable to the readmittance of the Jews who brought with them their more sophisticated business practices and international commercial networks, culminating in the founding of the Bank of England in 1694.

  While usury, or interest-based banking, was forbidden in Catholic Christianity, a reversal of this tradition took form with the advent of Protestantism. While Martin Luther and John Calvin both admitted to a certain extent the evil inherent in usury, they both declared it impossible to universally condemn. Francis Bacon in his Wo r k ssupported usury and criticized the Scholastics for “almost having incorporated the contentious philosophy of Aristotle into the body of Christian religion,” adding that Aristotle was “full of  ostentation” and “heretical.” 2

  By 1682, the redefinition of interest  became “a reward for forbearing the use of your own money for a term of time agreed upon, whatsoever need your self  may have of it in the meanwhile.” The trend continued toward distinguishing
between “interest” and “usury,” as defined  by Jeremy Bentham, who defined usury as, “the taking of a greater interest than the law allows… (or) the taking  of greater interest than is usual.” 3 Bentham’s In Defence of Usuryis a further example of the denunciation of Aristotle. But it was Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, which finally replaced the Bible’s definition of usury and became the “ Bible of  capitalism” in which he redefined interest as follows:

  The interest or the use of money… is the compensation which the borrower pays to the lender, for the profit which he has an    opportunity of making by the use of the money. Part of that profit naturally       belongs to the borrower who runs the risk and takes the trouble of employing  it; and part to the lender, who affords him the opportunity of making  thisprofit. 4

  Throughout the seventeenth century, precious metals from the New World, and other places like Japan had been channeled into Europe. Due to the free coinage, the  Bank of Amsterdam, and the heightened trade and commerce, Netherlands attracted even more coin and bullion. The advent of this excess wealth brought about the development of the fractional-reserve system of banking and payment that spread to England and elsewhere. The main developers of banking in London were the goldsmiths, who transformed from simple artisans to becoming depositories of gold and silver holdings. The safeguarding of the gold of merchants in strong rooms and issuing notes of credit  in return to the depositors allowed an opportunity for credit to be artificially created. The formula of the safe-keepers became known as fractional-reserve  banking, which relies on the probability that the majority of depositors will not attempt to cash their deposits all at the same time. Therefore, notes of credit can be used in the marketplace as “legal tender.” This practice became the forerunner of the check system and banknotes. Once the public accepted the creditworthiness of these credit notes, the safe-keepers of the deposits realized that only a fraction of the actual wealth held on deposit was necessary to keep in the vaults and that an additional 90% could be lent out at interest.

  In the middle of the eighteenth century Jacob Henriques claimed that his father had planned the establishment of the  Bank of England. 5 Partly as a consequence of the marriage between   Charles II and Catherine of Braganza, and especially after William and Mary became joint sovereigns of England, London  too     became  a  center  of  Sephardi  banking, leading figures being Anthony (Moses) da Costa, Solomon de Medina and Isaac Pereira. The  Glorious Revolution of 1688–1689  replaced  the reigning  king, James II, with the joint monarchy of his  Protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch husband William of Orange. The revolution imposed important limitations on royal authority. Parliament gained powers over taxation, over the royal succession, over appointments and over the right of the crown to wage war independently,  concessions that William considered a price worth paying in return for parliament’s financial support for   his  war  against France. William’s wars, however, profoundly changed the British state. Their massive cost led to the  growth  of modern financial institutions, most notably the  Bank of England, established in imitation of the  Bank of Amsterdam. The  Bank of England, which is the central bank of the United Kingdom and the model on which  most modern central banks have been based, was privately owned and operated  from its foundation.          In the reign  of Queen Anne (1702–14), Manasseh Lopes was a leading banker, and during the eighteenth century  Samson Gideon, Francis and Joseph Salvador, and the  Goldsmid brothers, leading members of  the  Ashkenazi community, were particularly infl         uential.         

  It was the Rothschilds, originally of Germany, who were the preeminent banking family of the modern age, and who created a banking empire that established branches all over Europe. The dynasty was founded by Amschel Mayer Bauer (1744-1812), who took on the name  Rothschild, for “red shield” in German.  Rothschild’s wealth was largely achieved through his association with the family of  Hesse-Kassel.  Rothschild served a three-year apprenticeship in Hanover at the Bank of Oppenheim, at the service to Lt. Gen. Baron von Estorff, who was the principal adviser to Landgrave Frederick II of  HesseKassel. Frederick II was the great-grandson of Elizabeth Charlotte, the of  Frederick V of the  Palatinate, and a member of the  Order of the Garter, as  well as the wealthiest man in Europe. Frederick II of Hessen-Kassel married Maria Princess of Hanover, the daughter of George II King of England. They had two sons, Prince Wilhelm of   Hesse (1743–1821) and  Prince Charles of Hesse-Kassel (1744-1836).

  Rothschild business grew through the provision of banking services to Crown Prince Wilhelm, who became Wilhelm IX, Landgrave of   Hesse-Kassel in 1785. Business expanded rapidly following the   French Revolution when Rothschild handled payments from Britain for the hire of Hessian mercenaries to Great Britain during the American Revolution. By the early years of the nineteenth century, Mayer Amschel  Rothschild had consolidated his position as principal international banker to Wilhelm IX and began to issue his own international loans, borrowing capital from the Landgrave.

  According to Rabbi Antelman in To Eliminate the Opiate, the Rothschilds, who were the founders of the Bavarian  Illuminati, were a  Sabbatean family belonging to a sect known as the  Frankists. Also known as Zoharists, the Frankists were founded in 1755 by  Jacob Frank, originally Jacob Leibowicz, who declared himself a reincarnation of Zevi, and who rejected the Talmudin favor of the  Zohar. Jacob Frank is believed to have been born in Eastern Poland, now Ukraine, in about 1726 into a   Sabbatean family. As a traveling merchant he often visited  Ottoman  Greece where he earned the nickname “Frank,” a name generally given in the East to Europeans. He also lived in Smyrna and Salonika where he was initiated into the  Sabbatean  Kabbalah by the radical Dönmeh circle that emerged from Osman Baba (Baruchya Russo). In 1755 he reappeared in Poland, gathered a group of local adherents and began to preach the “revelations” which were communicated to him by the  Dönmeh in  Salonika.

  The Jewish authorities in Poland excommunicated Frank and his followers due to  his      heretical  doctrines,  that  included deification  of          himself  as a            part of  a  trinity  and other  controversial concepts  such      as “purification      through transgression.” The  Frankists believed that in the  Messianic age the laws of the Torahwere no longer valid and all that had been formerly prohibited was now permitted, or even mandatory. Like the ancient Gnostics, they therefore indulged in orgiastic and sexually promiscuous and even incestuous rites, which led the Jewish community to brand them as heretics.

  As the previous  Sabbateans had already passed through  Judaism and Islam, the  Frankists believed they ought now also to assume  Christianityoutwardly, using it to conceal the real core of their belief of  Jacob Frank as the true  Messiah and the living God. Due to the persecution of the Jewish Rabbis for his heresy, Frank gained the support of the Catholic Church upon which Frank publicly burned the Talmud, declaring that he recognized only the  Zohar. In 1759, members of the sect converted to  Christianity but persisted in their heretical ways. Accompanied by his daughter Eve, Frank repeatedly traveled to Vienna and succeeded in gaining the favor of the Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa, the last of the House of  Habsburg, who regarded him as a disseminator of  Christianity among the  Jews. It is even said that her son, Holy Roman Emperor Joseph II, was fond of the young Eve Frank. Ultimately, Frank was deemed unmanageable and he was obliged to leave Austria. He moved with his daughter and his retinue to Offenbach, in Germany, where he assumed the title of “Baron of Offenbach,” and lived as a wealthy nobleman, receiving financial  support from his Polish and Moravian            followers, who made frequent pilgrimages to Offenbach.

  At their height, the  Frankists claimed perhaps 50,000 followers, primarily Jews living in Poland and other parts of Eastern Europe. The Frankists replicated the practices of the Sabbateans of Turkey, who, as Marc David Baer in The Dönme: Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries, and Secular Turkshas shown, developed ways to recognize each other, though they outwardly claimed to adhere to the dominant faith of the country, inter-married with each others, and supported each other financially       and otherwise, to maintain their religious institutions in secret, from generation to generation, for nearly four hundred years. Similarly, the dynasty’s founder, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, ordered his sons to marry        only their first cousins.

  Once converted to  Christianity , the  Frankists nevertheless fully integrated into mainstream Christian society, penetrating even to its highest echelons. Often  Frankists ran independent businesses, occupied public office, or became army officers. In Poland  and  Austria, various  families  were  even           admitted to the aristocracy. Among Frank’s followers, according to   Scholem, some were accepted into the administration and aristocracy of the Habsburgs “but they preserved a few  Frankist traditions and customs, so that a stratum was created in which the boundaries between  Judaism and  Christianity became blurred, irrespective of whether the members had converted or retained their links with  Judaism.” 6 It was reported in the 1840s that  Jews professing  Christianity were  found filling the offices of the ministry,     and that  Frankists had been discovered and probably existed among the Catholic and   Protestant church dignitaries of Russia, Austria and Poland. 7 Continuity was assisted through close intermarriage  among  Frankists.

  According to Gershom  Scholem, Frank had preached a “Religious Myth of  Nihilism.” Ultimately, Frank taught his followers that the overthrow and destruction of society was the only thing that could save mankind. Despite the fact that they were all outwardly religious, the  Frankists sought “the annihilation of every religion and positive system of belief,” and they dreamed “of a general revolution that would sweep away the past in a single stroke so that the world  might be rebuilt.”8 Of the revolutionary philosophy of the  Frankists, Gershom Scholem wrote, in  Kabbalah and Its Symbolism: “For Frank, anarchic destruction  represented all the Luciferian radiance, all the positive tones and overtones, of  the word Life.” 9 As a result, as Abraham Duker has pointed out, anti-Jewishness  was characteristic among the  Frankists, who rejected other  Jews’ adherence to the  Bible and resented the persecution they were made to endure:

  The  Frankists were also united by less positive aspects, namely dislike of the  Jews who forced them into conversion and thus cut them off from their near and dear ones as well as hatred of the Catholic clergy which had its share in this drastic step… The task of raising a new generation under such condition  of double Marranoism was   indeed a difficult one and required much cooperation and close-mouthedness. Kinship and the close social relations have made Frankism to a large extent a family religion, that has continually been strengthened by marriage and by economic ties through concentration in certain occupations. 10

  There were numerous examples of  Frankists as secret Christians exercising anti-Semitic views.  Frankists were accused in 1794 of treason and espionage on  behalf of   Russia with attempts at pogroms.11 In Jassy, a city in north-eastern  Romania, as Duker reports, an old man, an “Epicurius,” told the missionaries  that “both he and his son belonged to a secret society in Tarnopol…” with the  chief rabbi there as its head: “They work like   Jesuits, conforming externally to  Judaism, but diffusing their principles in secret Jewish families in Jassy, whose  children are            entirely under his influence, hating Judaism and keeping Christian as well as the Jewish  Sabbath. Another is baptized and is enjoined to bring up  the youth as Christian.” 12

  A leading crypto- Sabbatean, who collaborated with a   Sabbatean network of Frankists in England, Holland, Poland, and Germany, and who would exercise an important influence in Masonic and occult circles during the eighteenth century was Dr. Samuel Jacob  Falk. Known as the “ Baal Shem” of London, Falk had been denounced by Rabbi  Jacob Emden as a Sabbatean, and in Westphalia at one time Falk was sentenced to be burned as a sorcerer, but escaped to England. Frank was unwelcomed among the Jewish community of London, until he received the patronage of Aaron   Goldsmid, founder of the wealthy family of financiers.

  Falk rapidly gained fame as a  Kabbalist and worker of miracles, and many stories of his miraculous powers were current, which he was reputed to exercise through his supposed mastery of the magical names of God. Falk kept a diary containing records of dreams and the  Kabbalistic names of angels, which can be found in the library of the United Synagogue in London. 13 The following is  a summary provided in the Jewish Encyclopedia:

  Falk claimed to possess thaumaturgic powers and to be able to discover hidden treasure. Archenholz (England und Italien, I. 249) recounts certain marvels which he had seen performed by  Falk in Brunswick and which he attributes to a special knowledge of chemistry. In Westphalia at one time  Falk was sentenced to be burned as a sorcerer, but escaped to England. Here he was received with hospitality and rapidly gained fame as a Cabalist and worker of miracles. Many stories of his powers were current. He would cause a small taper to remain alight for weeks; an incantation would  fill his cellar with coal; plate left with a pawnbroker would glide back to his house. When a fire threatened to destroy the Great Synagogue, he averted the disaster by  writing four Hebrew letters on the pillars of the door. Dr. Hermann Adler, the Chief Rabbi of the British Empire from 1891 to 1911, observed that a horrible account of a Jewish  Kabbalist in The Gentleman’s Magazineof September 1762, “obviously refers to Dr.  Falk, though his name is not mentioned.” 14This  Kabbalist was described as “a christened Jew and the biggest rogue and villain in all the world,” who “had been imprisoned everywhere and banished out of all countries in Germany.” The writer goes on to relate that the  Kabbalist offered to teach him certain mysteries, but explained that before entering on any “experiments of the said godly mysteries, we must first avoid all churches and places of worshipping  as unclean.” He then bound the writer to an oath and proceeded to tell him that he must steal a Hebrew Bible from a Protestant and also procure “one pound of blood out of the veins of an honest Protestant.” The writer therefore robbed a Protestant, and had himself bled of a pound of blood, which he gave to the sorcerer. He then describes the ceremony that took place, when the following night they went into the writer’s garden, and the  Kabbalist put a cross, painted with the blood, in each corner, and in the middle a three fold circle. Then, all in blood,  in the first circle were written all the names of God in Hebrew; in the second the names of         the angels; and       in the third the first chapter of  the Gospel of John.  He then described the ritual sacrifice of a he-goat.

  According to Nesta Webster in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, “ Falk  indeed was far more than a Mason, he was a high initiate—the supreme oracle  to which the secret societies applied for guidance.” 15 Falk would have been one  of the “ Unknown Superiors” which Karl Gottlieb  von Hund claimed instructed  him in his creation of a new   Scottish Rite in Germany, which he renamed  “Rectified Masonry,”       and after 1764 the            “ Strict Observance.” In Paris, Hund had become acquainted with members of the  Jacobite cause and had supposedly learned from them their secrets. The  Jacobites were a political movement in Britain dedicated to the restoration of the  Stuarts. In what became known as the “Glorious Revolution,” in 1688 William of Orange invaded England in an action that ultimately deposed the last  Stuart King,  Charles II’s brother, James II of England. William won the crowns of England, Scotland and Ireland, and ruled jointly with his wife Mary II, until her death in 1694, a period referred to as the reign of “William and Mary.”

  Though William and Mary were of Stuart lineage, the Scots were disappointed at the loss of a Stuart monarch, and in 1689, the year of James II’s deposition, Bonnie Dundee led a force of Highlanders against government troops at Killiecrankie. The rebellion was called a  Jacobite Rising because of their support of James II, a name derived from the Latin Jacomus, or Jacob in Hebrew. The emblem of        the Jacobites, was  the five-petal  White Rose of York.

  In March 1702, William died and the throne passed to Mary’s sister who became Queen Anne. The failure of either Anne or of her sister to produce an heir precipitated a succession crisis, for, in the absence of a Protestant heir, the Roman Catholic James II could attempt to return to the Throne. The Parliament of England then passed the Act of Settlement in 1701, whereupon the Electress Sophia of Hanover, the sister of Elisabeth of  Bohemia, and both daughters of Frederick of the Palatinate and Elizabeth Stuart of the Rosicrucian Chymical Wed d in g, was designated heir to the British throne, if William III and his sisterin-law, Anne, both died without issue. When Sophia died a few weeks before Anne, Sophia of Hannover’s son became King George I in 1714. Through his mother, George inherited the haplogroup T2, indicating secret Jewish ancestry, and became the ancestor of the British Royal family into our time. 16 According to Leslie Gilbert Pine, the editor of the prestigious Burke’s Peerage,  Jews “have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the lords that a blow against the  Jews in this country would not be  possible without injuring the aristocracy also.” 17

  Since the exile of James II, the  Jacobite Cause strove to return the  Stuarts to the thrones of England and Scotland, united in 1707 as Great Britain. The grandson of James II,   Prince Charles Edward, also known as  Bonnie Prince Charlie, would lead the unsuccessful  Jacobite uprising, which ended in defeat at the Battle of Culloden in 1746. Among the  Jacobite exiles living in  France was Charles   Radclyffe who in 1725 is said to have founded a lodge in Paris, the  first  Masonic lodge outside of England, and was eventually acknowledged grand  master of all French lodges.  Radclyffe kept         a relatively low profile and seems to have worked through such men as the Chevalier Andrew  Ramsay, another supporter of the  Jacobite cause as well as a member of the  Royal Society. In 1737, Ramsay wrote his: Discourse pronounced at the reception of  Freemasons by Monsieur de Ramsay, Grand Orator of the Order,in which he alluded to   Freemasonry’s connection to the  Templar s .  Ramsay sent a copy to Cardinal Fleury, asking for a Church blessing of the principles of  Freemasonry. However, the obvious allusion to the heretical  Templars led Cardinal Fleury to reply with an interdiction of all Masonic reunions.

  While English  Freemasonry offered three degrees of initiation that became universal throughout the order about 1730,  Radclyffe appears to have been responsible for promulgating, if not in fact devising,  Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which introduced higher degrees and promised initiation into greater and more profound mysteries, supposedly preserved and handed down  in Scotland. The  Jacobite cause alleged that a  Masonic lodge had been founded  in Scotland, during the early eighteenth century, which drew its charter from a surviving  Templar chapter in Bristol, that had already been in operation for several hundred years.

  Hund claimed to have been initiated in 1741 into the Order of the Temple by his “ Unknown Superiors,” whose identities he was not to reveal. The history of the Order of the Temple is supposedly revealed in a text known as the  Larmenius Charter, a manuscript purportedly created by Johannes Marcus Larmenius, meaning “the   Armenian,” in February 1324. Not surprisingly, however, most researchers have concluded that it is a forgery, based on analysis  of the deciphered code, as well as of the circumstances of the supposed  discovery of the charter. 18

  In the document  Larmenius claims that the Grand Mastership of the Templars was transmitted to him by the imprisoned Jacques   de Molay, the last Grand Master.  Larmenius was supposedly a Palestinian-born Christian who had joined the Order during the Crusades. After the  Templar exodus from the Holy Land to Cyprus, after the fall of Acre in 1295,  Larmenius was left in charge as  Templar Seneschal, the second highest rank in the Order, until  de Molay was tricked into coming to Paris to be tried for heresy, for which he was eventually executed. In the document,  Larmenius states that he transferred his  Grand Mastership to Franciscus Theobaldus, the Prior of the  Templar Priory  still remaining at Alexandria, Egypt . Thus he secured a line of succession through to its semi-private unveiling at the Convent General of the Order at Versailles in 1705 by  Philippe, Duke of Orleans, elected Grand Master of the  Templar Order, and later also Regent of  France.

  Philippe, Duke of Orleans, was the son of King Louis XIII of  France and Anna of Austria, a descendent of  Barbara of Celje. Though a notorious  homosexual, he married Elizabeth Charlotte, Princess Palatine, the granddaughter of  Frederick V of the  Palatinate and  Elizabeth  Stuart, thus founding the House of Orleans, a cadet branch of the ruling House of Bourbon. As Joscelyn Godwin explained in The  Theosophical  Enlightenment, “The whole Orleans family, ever since Philippe’s great-grandfather the Regent, was notoriously involved  in the black arts.” 19 Last in succession in the  Larmenius Charterwas BernardRaymond  Fabré-Palaprat, who revealed the existence of the Charterin 1804.

  In Paris, in 1758,  Jacobites participated in a Grand Council of Emperors of the East and West which organized a Rite of Perfection, the precursor to the Scottish Rite. In 1761, Frederick the Great, King in Prussia, was acknowledged as the head of  Scottish Rite  Freemasonry. Frederick, who had been principally responsible for Prussia’s rise to power, was the grandson of King  George I of England, and therefore great-grandson of   Frederick V, Elector of the  Palatinate of the Rhine, and   Elizabeth  Stuart. In 1761, a Jew named Stephen Morin bearing the title of “Grand Elect Perfect and Sublime Master” was sent to America by the “Emperors” with a warrant from the Grand Lodge of Paris with  orders of establishing a lodge. In 1766, however, he was accused by the Grand  Lodge of England of “propagating strange and monstrous doctrines” and his  patent of Grand Inspector was withdrawn. Nevertheless, Morin succeeded in establishing the Rite of Perfection in America, where sixteen inspectors, nearlyall Jewish, were appointed. They included Isaac Long, Isaac de Costa, Moses  Hayes, B. Spitser, Moses Cohen, Abraham Jacobs, and Hyman Long.

  According to Jean-Pierre Bayard, the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite,  first  practiced in       France,  in which the 18th  degree is called Knight  of  the Rose Croix, was one of two Rosicrucian-inspired  Masonic rites that emerged towards the end of eighteenth century. The other was the  Rectified Scottish Rite,      that issued from the influence of Martinism.20 Martinism started with French mystic Martinez  Pasquales, who founded the Ordre des Chevalier Maçons  Elus-Coën de L’Univers(Order of the Knight Masons, Elected Priests of the  Universe), in 1754. Gershom  Scholem has called attention to the contacts  between  Frankists and the Ordre de Elus-Coën, 21 and  Pasquales had frequently been described as a Jew. A   Martinist named Baron de Gleichen wrote that, “Pasqualis was originally Spanish, perhaps of the Jewish race, since his disciples inherited from him a large number of Jewish manuscripts.” 22

  Saint-Martin devoted his later years almost entirely to the translation  of  Boehme and  his  chief  works.           Through  the influence of  Jacob Boehme, Martinism became a form of mystical  Christianity . It involved theurgical procedure, referring to the practice of rituals sometimes seen as magical in nature, performed with the purpose of invoking the action or evoking the presence of one or more “gods.”  Martinism purports to be concerned with the fall of the first man, his state of        material privation  from his divine source, and the process of his return, called ‘Reintegration’ or illumination. It was later propagated in different forms by  Pasquales’ two students, Louis Claude de Saint-Martin and Jean-Baptiste   Willermoz.  Willermoz was the formulator of the Rectified Rite, or Chevaliers Bienfaisants de la Cité-Sainte (CBCS), as a variant of the Rite of  Strict Observance, including some items coming from the Elect Cohen Order. The occult historian A.E. Waite said of the  Rectified Scottish Rite that he “had come to see the Régime  Ecossais  et  Rectifiéas maintaining, more than any other rite, the essence in ritual form of that secret tradition that ‘tells us not alone that the Soul “cometh from afar” and that the Soul returns  whence it came, but it delineates the Path of Ascent’.”23 It was, for him, truly  the secret tradition in practice.


  In the  Rectified Scottish Rite,   which was widespread in Central Europe, there was a strong presence of the Golden and Rosy Cross. The  Golden and Rosy Cross (Gold- und Rosenkreuz) was a revival of the seventeenth-century Rosicrucians organized in 1710 by a Saxon priest, Samuel Richter, known as Sincerus Renatus, who had studied the alchemist Paracelsus and Jacob  Boehme. The order began with Renatus’ The True and Perfect Preparation of the Philosopher’s Stone of the Brotherhood from the Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross Brotherhood. Under the leadership of Hermann Fictuld, because of political pressure, the group reformed itself extensively in 1767 and again in 1777. Its members claimed that the leaders of the  Rosicrucian Order had invented Freemasonry and only they knew the secret meaning of   Masonic symbols. The  Rosicrucian Order, they also claimed, had been founded by Egyptian “Ormusse” or “Licht-Weise” who had emigrated to Scotland with the name “Builders from the East.” Then the original Order disappeared and was supposed to have been resurrected by  Oliver Cromwell as “Freemasonry.”2

BLACK MAGIC WHITE SOLDIER PART 7

BLACK MAGIC WHITE SOLDIER ( RENASSAINCE & REFORMATION PART 3 )



   The Draculs were descended from the House of Basarab, a family which had an important role in the establishing of the Principality of Wallachia. The name “Basarab” likely originates from the Cumans or Pechenegs, a semi nomadic Turkic people of the  Central Asia, who gained control of Wallachia through the tenth and eleventh century, until defeated around 1091, when the Cumans of southern  Russia took control of the lands of Moldavia and  Wallachia.49  Vlad III Dracul was a Voivode of Wallachia, ruling mainly from 1456 to 1462, the period of the incipient   Ottoman conquest of the Balkans, and inspired the name of the vampire “Count  Dracula” in Bram  Stoker’s 1897 novel  Dracula. During his lifetime, Vlad III’s reputation for excessive and sadistic cruelty spread abroad, to Germany and elsewhere in Europe. The total estimated number of his victims range from 40,000 to 100,000. He acquired the name “The Impaler” for his preferred method of torture and execution of his enemies by impalement. Several German woodcuts show Vlad feasting in a forest of bodies on stakes, while a nearby executioner cuts apart other victims. It was reported that an invading   Ottoman army turned back in horror when it encountered thousands of rotting corpses on the banks of the Danube. It has also been said that in 1462 the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II “the Conqueror” returned to Constantinople after being sickened by the sight of 20,000 impaled corpses outside Vlad’s capital in Wallachia.

  Following Sigismund’s death in 1437, the Order lost prominence. However, the prestigious emblem of the Order was retained on the coat of arms of several Hungarian noble families, the most prominent being Bathory, Bocskai and Rakoczi. The Bathory family produced one King of Poland, and began the rule Transylvania        as princes under     the Ottomans in 1571, and briefly under  Habsburg suzerainty until 1600. The Calvinist magnate of Bihar county, Stephen Bocskai, managed to obtain through the Treaty of Vienna (1606) religious liberty and recognition as independent sovereign prince of an enlarged Transylvania. Under Bocskai’s successors, most notably Gabriel Bethlen and  George I Rakoczi, Transylvania passed through a golden age. George II  Rakoczi then married Sophia Bathory, uniting the two families. However,  George II Rakoczi’s defeat in Poland, combined with the subsequent invasions  of Transylvania by the Turks, led to Transylvania becoming a powerless vassal of the  Ottoman Empire.

  The most infamous member of the Bathory family was Countess  Elizabeth Bathory (1560-1614), who is regarded as the worst female serial killer in history, who was said to bathe in the blood of virgins to retain her youth. She is therefore remembered as the “Blood Countess,” and compared with  Vlad III the Impaler. After her husband’s death, she and four collaborators were accused of torturing and killing hundreds of girls, with one witness attributing to them over 650 victims, though they were convicted for only 80. Elizabeth herself was neither tried nor convicted but, in 1610, she was imprisoned in Slovakia where she remained until her death four years later.

  Frederick was personally invested with the  Order of the Garter at Windsorby his future father-in-law King James, a week before the wedding. The king presented him with a jewel-studded pendant of  St. George and the Dragon. Thus Frederick was to accept to fight          the Dragon  of Wrong and the defense of the Monarch. 50 In arranging the marriage of  Frederick to  Elizabeth  Stuart it was hoped that her father, King James of England, who appeared to support the  Protestant cause, would come to the assistance of his son-in-law in the case of an uprising against the Catholic Church and its   Hapsburg supporters. In 1618 the largely  Protestant estates of  Bohemia rebelled against their Catholic King Ferdinand, triggering the outbreak of the Thirty Years’ War. Expecting that King James would come to their aid, in 1619, the  Rosicrucians granted the throne of  Bohemia to Frederick in direct opposition to the Catholic  Habsburg rulers. Frederick accepted the offer and was crowned on 4 November of that year. However, James opposed the takeover of  Bohemia from the Habsburgs, and Frederick’s allies in the  Protestant Union failed to support him militarily by signing the Treaty of Ulm in 1620. Frederick’s brief reign as King of  Bohemia ended with his defeat at the Battle of White Mountain in the same year. Imperial forces invaded the  Palatinate and Frederic had       to flee to Holland in 1622, where he lived the rest of his life in exile with Elizabeth and their children, mostly at The Hague, and died in Mainz in 1632. For his short reign of a single winter, Frederick is often nicknamed the “Winter King.”

  The last to be heard of the  Rosicrucian brotherhood was a brief scare in  France when, in 1623, a notice declared: “We, deputies of the principal College of the Brethren of the Rosy Cross, are staying visibly and invisibly in this town by the Grace of the Most High, to whom the heart of the Just turns.” Another placard offered membership “to all those who wish to enter our Society and Congregation.” 51 The posters though gave no further instruction as to how or where prospective members might apply to the Rosy Cross brotherhood, but they suggested indirectly that those worthy would be recognized and contacted in due course.

  An anonymous work also published in 1623, titled Horrible Pacts made between the Devil and the Pretended Invisible Ones, claims that thirty-six “deputies” of the Rosy Cross had convened in Lyons where they celebrated a grand  Sabbath. There the members prostrated themselves before an emissary of the devil, and swore they would renounce all the rites and sacraments of the Christian Church. In return,  Satan’s representative bestowed upon them magical powers, including the ability to transport themselves wherever they pleased, to speak with such eloquence and apparent wisdom that people would always be drawn to listen, to disguise themselves so cleverly that they would always appear to be natives of whatever place they found themselves, and to keep them forever supplied with  gold. Finally, the manifestos confirmed that six            missionaries had instantaneously been posted to Paris, where they went into hiding in a quarter of the city favored by Protestants. No more posters appeared, no applicants for membership made themselves known, and the  Rosicrucians apparently vanished from Paris.

  The legend inspired the chief exponents of Rosicrucianism, Robert  Fludd (1574-1637) and the German Jew Michel  Maier.  Fludd travelled for six years in  France, Germany,  Italy and  Spain, where he studied with Jewish Kabbalists and was visited by  Maier, Rudolf II’s personal physician. By his own account, Fludd also spent a winter in the Pyrenees studying theurgy with the  Jesuits. 52Fludd’s Apologiaopens with an invocation of the traditions of the prisca theologia, particularly “Mercurius Trismegistus,” or  Hermes Trismegistus, as the reputed  author Corpus Hermeticumand the supposed   Emerald Tablet, a work highly prized by the Arab alchemists.   Fludd defended the  Rosicrucians from charges of “detestable  magic and diabolical superstition.” The  Rosicrucian brothers, explains  Fludd, only used good kinds of  magic—Magia,  Kabbalah and Astrologia—that were mathematical and mechanical. The  magic of the  Kabbalah was holy, he argued, teaching how to invoke the sacred names of angels.

 In the  Rosicrucian  Enlightenment, Frances Yates argues that, in addition to the influence of  John Dee,  Bacon’s movement for the advancement of learning was also closely connected with the German  Rosicrucian movement, while Bacon’s  New  Atlantisportrays a land ruled by   Rosicrucians. In 1618, Francis Bacon decided to secure a lease for York House, where he would host banquets that were attended by the leading men of the time, including poets, scholars, authors, scientists, lawyers, diplomats, and foreign dignitaries. On 22 January 1621, in honour of Sir Francis Bacon’s sixtieth birthday, a select group of men assembled in the large banquet hall in York House without fanfare for what  has been described as a  Masonic banquet.53 Only those of the Rosicrosse  (Rosicrucians) and the Masons who were already aware of Bacon’s leadership role were invited. 54 On that day, a long-time friend of Bacon, the poet Ben  Jonson, best known for his satirical plays, Volpone, The Alchemist, and Bartholomew Fair, gave a  Masonic ode to Bacon.

  According to Robert  Fludd, following the collapse of the  Rosicrucian  movement in the  Palatinate, “those who were formerly called Brothers of the
Rosy Cross are today called the Wise, the name (of Rose Cross) being so odious to contemporaries that it is already buried away from the memory of man.” 55 During the Thirty Years War, Andrea had created a network of secret societies known as the Christian Unions. Their original purpose was to preserve what was  deemed threatened       knowledge,  especially the recent scientific advances, many     of which the Church deemed heretical. They also functioned as a refuge for  persons formerly associated with the defeated  Rosicrucians in Germany. Once in  England, these men, both English and European, formed the  Invisible College  in obvious allusion to  Bacon’s college of initiates suggested in his  New  Atlantis.

  Masonic tradition holds that  Bacon’s The  New  Atlantisprovided the original vision for the political development of America. The  Atlantis myth was first mentioned by  Plato, referring to a lost continent that had supposedly existed in  the Atlantic Ocean. Medieval European writers, receiving the tale from Arab geographers, believed the mythical island to have actually existed and later writers tried to identify it with an actual country. When America was discovered,  the Spanish historian Francesco Lopez de Gomara, in his General History of the  Indes, suggested that  Plato’s  Atlantis and the new continents were the same.  The theory was repeated by  Francis  Bacon, in his utopian romance, The  New Atlantis.   The     work  signifi cantly resembles     Johann Valentin  Andreae’s Description of the Republic of Christianopolis. In The  New  Atlantis, published in 1627, after the foundation of the English colonies in the Americas,  Bacon suggests that the continent of America was the former  Atlantis where there existed an advanced race during the Golden Age of civilization.  Bacon tells the story of a country ruled by philosopher-scientists in their great college called Solomon’s House. They possess a superior knowledge which was imparted to them by heavenly beings,  and have flying machines and ships which travel underthe sea.   

  Solomon’s House was modeled on the lines of the   Invisible College advocated in  Rosicrucian writings, and  Bacon’s books often featured title pages with what became  Masonic symbols, including the compass and the square, the two pillars of Solomon’s temple and the blazing triangle, and the eye of god. In a speech to Parliament,  Bacon alluded to the establishment of Solomon’s House in the American colonies as the blueprint for the country, and has been acknowledged as such by  Freemasons, who regard America as imparted with  an  important  destiny  in  fulfilling  Plato’s vision for a universal state.  Bacon played a leading role in creating the British colonies, especially in Virginia, the Carolinas, and Newfoundland in northeastern Canada. Francis expressed his views on this subject several times, claiming that the New Kingdom on Earth  which was Virginia exemplified the Kingdom of Heaven.

  The  Invisible College later became the  Royal Society, a learned society devoted to the study of the natural sciences, founded in 1660. They were influenced by  the   scientific method   of  the  “new  science,” as promoted by Francis Bacon in his New Atlantis. Therefore, paradoxically, the Western scientific tradition of empiricism, which today is understood as having been opposed to superstition and the belief in the supernatural, was wrought from the superstitions of the occult. The only “superstition” it opposed was traditional religion. Magicians,            as Pliny the   Elder            pointed out  in the first century AD,     have often adopted the pretense of science to justify their false teachings. Astrology became astronomy; alchemy became chemistry. In The Scientifi c Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science, John Henry remarked that, “a number of historians of science have refused to accept that something which they see as so irrational could have had any impact whatsoever upon the supremely rational pursuit of science. Their arguments seem to be based on mere prejudice, or on a failure to understand the richness and complexity of the magical tradition.” 56 Western science has its origin in what was known as Natural Philosophy, a branch of magic that sought to study the universe in order to discover, and later  manipulate, its occult properties.

  Virtually all the founding members of the  Royal Society were  Freemasons. It is not known exactly at what date  Freemasonry was created, as it is difficult to separate fact from legend. Following the establishment of the Scottish lodges, The first initiation into  Freemasonry on record is that of Elias   Ashmole, to have taken place in 1646.  Ashmole, an antiquarian and astrologer also interested in  alchemy, was a founding member of the  Royal Society.  Ashmole was also deeply interested in Rosicrucianism, having written a letter admiring the aims of the order and requesting admittance.

  Speculative masonry gradually dissociated from operative masonry with the rise in interest in classical architecture. Early  Masonic writings identify building and architecture with geometry, or “sacred geometry,” actually referring to the art of divination known as geomancy. In sacred geometry, symbolic and sacred meanings are ascribed to certain geometric shapes and certain geometric proportions. According to the Constitutions of  Freemasons, published by James Anderson in 1725, in “ignorant times” it was “condemn’d for conjuration.”  Masonic legend maintains that geometry was discovered before the Flood, and was taught to the Egyptians by Abraham. The invention of geometry is also attributed to  Hermes       Trismegistus,          who   is            identified with  Euclid. As Frances Yates explained:

  Thus the origins of geometry, or masonry, and therefore of  Freemasonry, recede into the most distant Hebraic or Egyptian past, and are surrounded by mystiques which clearly relate to the  Renaissance conception of ‘ancient wisdom’, of the prisci theologi, or pristine theologians, whence all true wisdom is derived. In the masonic mythology, the true ancient  wisdom was enshrined in the geometry of the Temple, built by Solomon  with the aid of Hiram Abif, King of Tyre.57

  As Marsha Keith Schuchard pointed out, by appropriating the  Kabbalistic speculations of the Jewish mason-guilds, the God of   Freemasonry became the Great Architect of the Universe, and the true ancient wisdom was enshrined in the geometry, the craft employed in the rebuilding of the  Temple of Solomon. 59 The original Temple was built with the aid of Hiram Abiff, whose martyrdom  forms the basis of the  Gnostic  dying-god ritual, whose imitation is designed to  represent the death and rebirth of the initiate.




THE YEAR 1666


  Members of the Invisible College were responsible in fanning millenarian ideas  among the English Puritans about the approach of the Messianic time that  became popular in the seventeenth century. Cromwell had led the forces of  Parliament against Charles I, son of King James I Stuart, in the English Civil Wars, which challenged his attempts to negate parliamentary authority, while simultaneously using his position as head of the English Church to pursue religious policies which generated the animosity of reformed groups such as  The Puritans. Charles was defeated in        the First Civil War          (1642 –45),  after which Parliament expected him to accept its demands for a constitutional  monarchy. Charles        I had   remained defiant by attempting to forge an alliance with Scotland and escaping to the Isle of Wight. Cromwell then ordered Colonel Pryde in 1648 to purge Parliament of those members who had voted in favor of a settlement with the King, known as “Pryde’s purge.” The remaining members were known as the “Rump Parliament.”

  The Cromwellian government was commonly regarded as a Rosicrucian circle. Samuel Butler (1612–1680), in     his satire of  the Restoration, Characters, tells of “the Brethren of the Rosy-Cross” as having attempted a misguided reformation of “their government.” A character in Butler’s other work Hudibras explains: “The Fraternity of the Rosy-Crucians is very like the Sect of the antient Gnostici who called themselves so, from the excellent Learning they pretend to,  although they were really the most ridiculous Sots of all Mankind.” 1 According  to Paul Benbridge, Cromwellians also referred to themselves as Rosicrucians,  such as Andrew Marvell  (1621– 1678),        a metaphysical poet          who sat in theHouse of Commons. The other prominent Rosicrucian-Cromwelllian was Marvell’s close friend, John Milton, who had a strong interest in Hermeticism.2

  Millenarian thinkers tended to show a very high regard for the Jewish religion and its causes, such that they are often referred to as “philo-Semitic.” Given that the era was one of much religious persecution against the Jews, who continued to be forbidden entry into England, and taking into account their tendency to follow interpretations that followed more closely to Kabbalistic ideas,    while  often  openly flaunting Christian orthodoxy, we should suppose that these millenarians were for the most part secret Jews, as their affiliations with leading      Jewish philosophers and   activists at the time would further confirm.

  Millenarian ideas included the redemption of the  Jews and their return to the land of  Israel from where they would rule the world. As Christopher Hill has indicated, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800,calculations of the precise date of the end of the world, based on the Book of Danieland Revelation, occupied some of the best mathematicians, from Napier in the late sixteenth century, to  Newton at the end of the seventeenth.  Consensus agreed that 1260 years should be added to the date the Antichrist established his power, which Protestants took to be the Pope. Various  calculations therefore settled on the years 1650-1656 for his destruction, the  gathering of the Gentiles, the conversion of the  Jews and their return to  Palestine. Other estimates offered the year 1666. 3

  The conversion of the  Jews and the spreading of  Christianity to the rest of the world were deemed necessary conditions for the millennium to occur. Another condition was the destruction of the  Ottoman Empire which controlled Palestine and under whose rule most  Jews lived. The conversion of the  Jews and the            “gathering  of the   Gentiles” also provided    justification  for British colonialism, as it could supposedly be furthered by conquests in the New World. The same  anticipation was found among the  Jews, especially in the Near East. The  Zohar was said to have predicted a return of the  Jews to  Palestine for 1648. 4

  The millenarians were also connected to the  Fifth Monarchy Men, who expected the imminent end of the fourth empire, and a new age, based on the traditional interpretation of the prophecies of the four kingdoms described in the  Book of Daniel. They supported  Cromwell’s Republic in the expectation that  it  was   a  preparation  for            the  “fifth monarchy”  that  would  succeed  the Babylonian, the Persian, the Greek, and Roman world empires. The last empire,  they concluded, would be established by the return of  Jesus as King of Kings and Lord of Lords to reign with his saints on earth for a thousand years. They also referred to the year 1666 and its relationship to the number 666, Number  of the Beast in the  Book of Revelation, identified with   the ultimate human despot to rule the world, indicating the end of earthly rule by carnal human beings,  but who would be replaced by the second coming of the  Messiah.

  A desire to better comprehend prophesies of the end times resulted in widespread interest in Jewish ideas on the subject. Most sought after was the knowledge of  Menasseh Ben  Israel, a  Kabbalist rabbi living in Amsterdam, who was devoted to the messianism of Isaac  Luria. 5 Unlike the persecution they suffered elsewhere,  Jews were allowed to keep their Jewish identity openly  in Amsterdam, where they achieved important commercial status.  Marranos began arriving in Amsterdam in 1590, eleven years after the Union of Utrecht (1579) and the creation of the United Provinces of the  Netherlands as a Protestant state. Here, too,  Jews would have to wait until 1615 before their settlement was officially authorized. As a result, Amsterdam became one of the greatest Jewish centers in the world in the seventeenth century, becoming  known as “the Dutch  Jerusalem.” The city was also a haven for persecuted  Jews from places other than  Spain and   Portugal, including   France in 1615 and  Eastern Europe after the Chmielnicki massacres in 1648.

  Jewish involvement in banking proper really begins with the activities of those  Conversos  who, fleeing the  Inquisition  in  Portugal and  Spain, settled in Antwerp, Hamburg, and Amsterdam, some remaining nominally Christian and some openly returning to  Judaism. In Antwerp, Jewish families of merchant bankers had commercial relations extending as far as the East Indies and Brazil. While they remained Catholics, those who emigrated to Hamburg and Amsterdam formed Sephardi communities. In Hamburg, which was destined to become one of the wealthiest and most productive Marrano centers, the settlement of  Jews  was not officially  authorized until  1612  and Jewish public worship not until 1650. In Hamburg they participated in the founding of the bank in 1619. Local  Jews were among its first shareholders, and   some  of them         were            financial agents for various North European courts, especially those of Denmark and Schleswig-Holstein. Most famous in Antwerp were Diego Teixeira de Sampaio, consul and paymaster general for  the Spanish government, and        his son Manuel who succeeded him as financial agent of Christina of Sweden. Manuel Teixeira was an outstanding member  of the Hamburg exchange and participated actively in the transfer of Western European subsidies to the German or Scandinavian courts.

  Millenarian beliefs were so prevalent that Manasseh, in his letter to Oliver Cromwell and the Rump Parliament, appealed to them as a reason to readmit Jews to England, saying, “[T]he opinions of many Christians and mine do concur  herein, that we both believe that the restoring time of our Nation into their native  country is very near at hand.” 6 Menasseh believed that the  Messianic age needed  as its certain precondition the settlement of  Jews in all parts of the known world.  Fired by this idea, he turned his attention to England where the  Jews had been  expelled since 1290. The Puritans were inclined to support the readmittance of  the  Jews whom they saw as victims of the persecution of their hated enemy, the  Catholic Church. Manasseh attracted the notice of many Puritan theologians  who also became convinced of the immanent arrival of the  Messiah.

  But it was especially several of the more mystically-minded of the Puritans  in England who had become interested in the question and Manasseh entered  into correspondence with several of them, including John  Dury. Dury, together with  Comenius, Bishop of the Bohemian Brethren, and Samuel  Hartlib, another acquaintance of  Menasseh, formed the core of a correspondence network called the  Hartlib Circle. The  Hartlib Circle devoted themselves to the cultivation of the “new philosophy,” referring euphemistically to their interest mainly in  alchemy. Like the  Invisible College, the  Hartlib Circle was modeled as a research institute described by Sir  Francis  Bacon as “Salomon’s House” in his New  Atlantis. Not known in his own day for his published writings,   Hartlib was virtually forgotten by historians, until the rediscovery of an archive of his personal papers. The plan for  Andreae’s Societas Christianawas already set forth in two works that were believed to have been lost until they were discovered  recently among the  Hartlib papers.

  Hartlib had come to England in 1628, after the Catholic conquest of Elbing in Polish Prussia, as part of the disruptions of the Thirty Years War.

  Hartlib had been the head of a mystical group like   Andreae’s Christian Unions, pursuing  Rosicrucian ideals. When he arrived in England, he collected around him refugees from Poland,  Bohemia and the  Palatinate.  Elizabeth  Stuart, widow of   Frederick V, Elector Palatine and sister of King  Charles I, was the chief patron of  Hartlib, Dury and  Comenius. Dury, who was an enthusiastic supporter of  Hartlib’s projects, was also closely associated with  Elizabeth Stuart and with her adviser Sir Thomas Roe, and took an active interest, as did  Hartlib, in the restoration of her son, Charles Louis to the  Palatinate.  Theodore Haak who was  Comenius’ agent in England was also a refugee of  the  Palatinate. 7

  Comenius met with the defeated  Frederick V in The Hague to share with him prophecies outlined in a work called Lux in Tenebris (“Light in Darkness”). It contained the pronouncements of three prophets, one of whom named Christopher Kotter who promised the future restoration of Frederick to the Kingdom of  Bohemia. Kotter’s visions were apparently brought to him by “angels” who would suddenly make themselves visible, show him a vision and then disappear.   Comenius named  Andreae as one of those who inspired him towards the reform of education. Considered the father of modern education, Comenius was one of the earliest champions of universal education, a concept eventually set forth in his book Didactica Magna. 8 The  Comenius Medal, a  UNESCO award, honors outstanding achievements  in the fields      of education research and innovation.

   Johann Valentin  Andreae recognized   Comenius as his heir and encouraged him to carry on his reforming   Rosicrucian ideas.  Comenius was concerned with founding an “ Invisible College,” which he envisioned as a network and intellectual meeting-ground for people of science and learning all over the world. Hans Schick said of   Comenius:

  We have in him not only the middleman between the father of  Rosicrucian thought, J. V.  Andreae, and those who stood as godparents at the birth of English  Freemasonry, such as  Hartlib, Dury and others, but also the bridge from  Rosicrucian ideology to organized  Freemasonry in general. He received the torch from  Andreae and carried it to the British Isles.9

  The  Hartlib papers revealed his personal correspondence to have been extensive. It ranged from Eastern and Central as well as Western Europe, Great Britain and Ireland and New England. Among the extensive network of the Hartlib Circle were  John Milton, author of Paradise Lost, and   John Winthrop, one of the leading       figures in the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, The first major settlement in New England after Plymouth Colony. Winthrop was also an alchemist and follower of   John Dee. 10 Comenius would later turn down an invitation from Winthrop to become president of Harvard University, which had been founded in 1636.

  John Dury introduced Manasseh to the views of Antonio de Montesinos, the Portuguese traveler who brought back reports that some of the  Lost Tribes were living among the natives of the Andes in South America. In response to this,  Menasseh wrote on 23 December 1649: “…I think that the Ten Tribes live not only there… but also in other lands scattered everywhere; these never did come back to the Second Temple and they keep till this day still the Jewish Religion…” 11 Manasseh therefore wrote a treatise on the  Lost Tribes, and in support of the readmission of the  Jews into England published  his Esperança de  Israel(“Hope of  Israel”).

  The  millenarian prophecies had been mostly illegal and regarded as subversive until they began to be deliberately promoted by  Cromwell’s parliament. Popkins describes their publishing of scholarly works discussing the coming of the millennium as “shrewd policy,” in their struggle against the notion of the divine right of kings. By regarding   Charles I and his advisors as supporters   of the Pope, they justified that   good  Christians ought to fight for their overthrow. The excitement fanned by the Parliamentarian publicists grew as millenarians became more involved in politics. A pamphlet of 1648 had referred critically to “all these Cabbalistical Millenarians and Jew restorers.” 12

  Cromwell was also closely acquainted with the sizeable number of Marrano merchants settled in London, who formed there a secret congregation, at the head of which was Antonio Fernandez Carvajal. When their group at Rouen was denounced to the authorities as secret  Jews,    many of them eventually fled to London. All were living nominally as Catholics, attending mass regularly in the Chapel of the French or  Savoy Ambassador. They conducted extensive business with the Levant, East and West Indies, Canary Islands, and Brazil, but particularly with the  Netherlands,  Spain, and   Portugal. By forming an important link in the network of trade spread throughout the Spanish and Portuguese territories by the  Marranos, their position enabled them to provide Cromwell important information as to the plans both of Charles  Stuart in Holland and of the Spanish in the New World.

  Lord Alfred Douglas, who edited Plain English, in an article of September 3, 1921, explained how his friend, Mr. L.D. Van Valckert of Amsterdam had come into possession of a missing volume of records of the Synagogue of Muljeim, which contained records of letters written to, and answered by the Directors of the Synagogue. A letter written to the Directors of the Synagogue of Muljeim, dated June 16, 1647, had stated: “From O.C. [Olivier  Cromwell]  to Ebenezer Pratt:          In return for financial support will advocate       admission of Jews to England. This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.”  On July 12, 1647,            Ebenezer Pratt replied,    “Will   grant  financial aid as soon as Charles removed, and  Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles should be given an opportunity to escape. His recapture will then make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.” 13 Eventually King Charles surrendered          and finally,  in 1649, he was tried and beheaded. With no king to consider, Parliament established an interim period of Commonwealth. In 1653, Oliver  Cromwell terminated both his Parliament and the Commonwealth and, appointing himself Lord Protector, ruled by military force alone.

  In 1954,  Menasseh Ben  Israel met in  Belgium with  millenarian Isaac  La Peyrère and  Queen Christina of Sweden, an avid student of the occult. Michel Le Bion, her Amsterdam-based art consultant, was rumored to be a  Rosicrucian. 14 Christina had established numerous important relationships with  Jews, also hoping to open Sweden to Jewish immigration. Her doctor was a Jew, Benedict de Castro, who combined  Kabbalah with physiological research. Her collection included  John Dee’s Monas Hieroglyphica, parts of a   Picatrixand a Latin version of the Sefer-ha-Raziel, a book of angelic  magic. Susanna Akerman argues that the Sefer-ha-Razielwas the De Magia Cabalistica of   Menasseh and that it was the alleged source book of the  Rosicrucian movement. 15

  La Peyrère  (1596 –1676) was  a  Kabbalistic messianist born into a Huguenot  family       in Bordeaux,     and possibly of Marrano Jewish descent. He was influenced by Thomas  Hobbes, a friend of  Francis  Bacon and  Ben  Jonson, and was an influence on     Baruch Spinoza. The abdicated  Queen Christina of Sweden paid for the publication of his Praeadamitae in 1655. In Prae-Adamitae,  La Peyrère argued that Paul’s words in his Epistle to the Romansshould be interpreted such  that “if Adam sinned in a morally meaningful sense there must have been an Adamic law according to which he sinned. If law began with Adam, there must have been a lawless world before Adam, containing people.” 16 Thus, according to  La Peyrère there must  have been  two  creations:          first the        creation of the Gentiles and then that of Adam who was father of the  Hebrews. The existence of  pre-Adamites,  La Peyrère argued, explained Cain’s life after Abel’s murder, which according to Genesisinvolved the taking of a wife and the building of a city. But Prae-adamitaewas banned and burned everywhere for its heretical claims that Adam was     not the first  man, that the Bible is not the history of mankind, but only the history of the  Jews, that the Flood was a local event, that Moses did not write the Pentateuchand that no accurate copy of the  Bible exists.

  La Peyrère also served as secretary to the Prince of Condé. It has since emerged that, in fact: “Condé,  Cromwell and Christina were negotiating to create a theological-political world state, involving overthrowing the Catholic king of   France, among other things.” 17 La Peyrère, who is sometimes regarded as the father of  Zionism, argued that the  Jews are about to be recalled, that the Messiah is coming for them, that they should join the Christians, and with the king of  France rebuild Zion. 18 After reading  La Peyrère’s Du Rappel des Juifs, Menasseh rushed back to Amsterdam where he excitedly told a gathering of millenarians at the home of John Dury’s schoolmate and friend, Peter  Serrarius, that the coming of the Jewish   Messiah was imminent. La Peyrère also argued that the  Messiah would join with the king of  France, meaning the Prince of Condé, not Louis XIV, to liberate the Holy Land, rebuild the Temple and set up a world government of the  Messiah with the king of  France acting as regent.  Then the  Jews will rule the world from  Jerusalem.

  Menasseh departed for England to present a petition to  Cromwell. In England, where he stayed between 1655 and 1657, he met often with leading English thinkers, including two founding members of the   Royal Society, Robert Boyle and John Dury’s son-in-law Henry  Oldenburg, as well as Ralph Cudworth, and  Henry More of the Cambridge Platonists, to discuss theological and philosophical topics. The  Hartlib papers show that both   Hartlib and Dury were very much involved in the translation of  Menasseh’s books, and in the events which culminated in his trip to England to negotiate with   Cromwell. Dury had been managing the discussions and helped  Menasseh explain that It was necessary to fulfill all the prophecies before the messianic age would            begin. 19 Cromwell summoned the most notable statesmen, lawyers, and theologians of the day to the Whitehall Conference in December of 1655. The chief result was the declaration that “there was no law which forbade the  Jews’ return to England.” Though nothing was done to regularize the position of the  Jews, the door was opened to their gradual return.

  Cromwell  had  been  moved    to  sympathy  with the  Jewish cause   chiefly because he foresaw the importance for English commerce of the presence of the Jewish merchant princes, some of whom had already found their way to London. As Richard Christopher Hill explained:

  The  Jews’ potential usefulness to the development of a forward colonial and commercial foreign policy was an additional reason for English interest in them. As early as 1643  Jews in the  Netherlands were said to be financing Parliament. Their  command of bullion was enormous;            they controlled the Spanish and Portuguese trades; the Levant trade was largely in their hands; they were interested in developing commerce with the East and West Indies. To governments they were useful as contractors and as spies. If the ambitious scheme for Anglo-Dutch union put forward by the Commonwealth in 1661 had come off, then the  Jews in the  Netherlands would have been taken together with the  Dutch colonial empire and its trade. When the Dutch refused to be incorporated into the British Empire, Dutch merchants were to ally  excluded from all British possessions by the Navigation Act of 1651.  This development made many  Jews in the  Netherlands—especially those trading with the West Indies—anxious to transfer to London: and it redoubled the interest of the English government in attracting them there. The policy paid off: Jewish intelligence helped the preparations  for  Cromwell’s Western Design of 1655. 20

  The Western  Design was  a  part of   the Anglo-Spanish  War,   a conflict between the English Protectorate of Oliver  Cromwell and  Spain, between 1654  and 1660. It involved an attack on the Spanish West Indies that was intended to secure a base of operations in the Caribbean from which to threaten trade and treasure routes in the Spanish         Main, thus weakening Catholic influence in the New World. In 1655,  Cromwell sent an expedition led by Sir  William Penn, and General Robert Venables, who invaded Spanish territory in the West Indies with the objective of capturing Hispaniola. However, the assault failed because the Spanish had improved their defenses in the face of Dutch attacks earlier in the century. Despite various subsequent successes, such as an established presence in Jamaica,  Cromwell saw the operation as a general failure, and Venables and Penn were imprisoned therefore in the Tower of London on their arrival on England.

  When  Cromwell died in 1658, his despotic legacy fell to his son Richard who did not possess his father’s ruthlessness, with the result that it was not long before Charles II the late king’s son was invited back to rule as King of England. The “Restoration” of   Charles II   Stuart to the throne thus occurred in 1660. In that same year, the  Royal Society was established and  Charles II became its patron. The foundation of the  Royal Society was the contacts and correspondents of the  Hartlib Circle. Theodor Haak of the  Palatinate is credited with having started the meetings which led to the foundation of the  Royal Society. He was joined by John Wilkins, an author of a book based on ideas of  John Dee and alchemist Robert  Fludd, and later chaplain to Prince Elector of the  Palatinate in London. 21 Another founding member was Henry  Oldenburg, who was also  a close friend of fellow  Royal Society and  Hartlib Circle member, Robert Boyle. Both had met with  Menasseh on his visit to London. In a dedication, Comenius addressed the members of the  Royal Society as “ Illuminati,” thus identifying  them as a realization of the intellectual college he envisions in his book, the Way of Light. Deliberately excluded from the Society’s areas of study were typical university disciplines of metaphysic, divinity, morals, grammar, logic and rhetoric. Instead, studies were strictly secular, focusing on manufacture, machines and inventions and also the recovery of ancient skills and secrets. “It seems likely,” explains Christopher McIntosh, “that the  Royal Society, founded in 1660, was an attempt to realize in practical terms the  Rosicrucian ideals of a brotherhood of learning and enlightenment which would help usher in the  kind of Utopia visualized by  Bacon,  Andreae,   Comenius, and others.” 22

  As a result of their  millenarian expectations, several members of the Royal Society were much concerned with the advent of the notorious false messiah,  Sabbatai Zevi. On his visit to   Cromwell in 1655,  Menasseh had been accompanied by Raphael Supino, a leading member of the Jewish community of Livorno,  Italy, who would also become a follower of  Sabbatai Zevi. 23 Sabbatai Zevi was born in Smyrna, in  Ottoman  Greece, in 1626. Although as a  child Zevi was enrolled in a Yeshiva to study the Talmud, he was fascinated by mysticism and the  Kabbalah ,    as influenced by Rabbi Isaac Luria. When he was about twenty years of age, Sabbatai would sink alternately into deep depression or become filled with ecstasy during which he would break Judaic laws, like eating non-kosher food, speak the forbidden name of God and commit other  “holy sins.” At age 22, in 1648, Sabbatai started declaring to his followers in Smyrna that he was the  Messiah. In order to prove this claim he started to pronounce the Tetragrammaton in Hebrew, an act which  Judaism emphatically prohibited to all but the Jewish high priest in the Temple in  Jerusalem on the Day of Atonement.


  Sabbatai Zevi’s   Messianic pretensions  finally led the Rabbis  to  place          him and his followers under a ban of cherem, a type of excommunication in  Judaism. Sabbatai claimed that since he as messiah arrived, the laws of the Torah were no longer applicable. His new prayer was, “Praised be He who permits the forbidden.” Sabbatai abolished the laws concerning sexual relationships, and eventually declared that all of the thirty-six major biblical sins were now permitted and, much like the Gnostics before him, instructed some of his followers that it was  their duty to perform such sins in order to hasten the Redemption.