CHAPTER
LXIII
THE
RIBBON SOCIETY
(ROMAN
CATHOLIC)
(Founded
1805)
This
society appeared about 1805-1807.
We are
again indebted to Captain Pollard for a sketch of its history : " After
the suppression of the United irishmen the society, as such, disappeared, but
within a year or two we find a renaissance of the old agrarian Catholic secret
societies which had been absorbed into the Defenders and thence into the United
Irishmen. The provisions of the Insurrection Act which forbade the possession
of arms and enforced a curfew at nightfall were in operation until 1805, when
with its relaxation appears the Ribbon Society... In different counties local
organizations of Ribbon men called themselves by different titles, such as the
Threshers, the Carders, the Molly Maguires, Rockites, Caravats, Shanavests,
Pauddeen Gar's men and the like. " '
The
Ribbon Society " continued the system of organization used by the United
Irishmen. A lodge was limited to forty members and they met as a rule in the
fields by night, armed sentinels being posted to guard the spot. The lodge was
under a Master or Body Master, who controlled three committee-men, each of whom
was responsible for twelve members of the lodge.
The
Masters were represented on divisional committees allocated on the basis of
four or more divisions to a geographical county. The divisional committees were
controlled by Parish Masters, who in turn were represented on the County
Council, which contributed two delegates to the National Board.
"
As Whiteboys they certainly were at political and practical war with the
Orangemen, and throughout their activities appear to have been criminal and
anti- social ; outrage, terrorism and murder being their only methods of
political conversion. "
For root
of this movement see Chapter LV.
CHAPTER
LXIV
THE
CERNEAU RITE (ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE)
(Founded
1808)
The
following article is quoted in part from an article specifically written by
Josiah H. Drummond 33° in The History Of Freemasonry and Concordant Orders by
Stillson and Hughan : '
"
In 1806 Joseph Cerneau appeared in New York; he had been a member of Masonic
bodies in the West Indies ; he had a patent from Mathieu Dupotet certi- fying
that he had received the degrees of the Scottish Rite of Heredom, and
authorizing him to confer the degrees up to the Twenty-fourth and organize
bodies in the northern part of Cuba, and to confer the Twenty fifth on one
person in each year, the Twenty-fifth being then the highest degree of the Rite
and the highest Cerneau had received, according to his patent. Cerneau had his
patent from Dupotet, who had his from Germain Hacquet, who had his from Du
Plessis, who had his from Prevost in 1790, who had his from Francken. "
In 1808
he called a grand consistory of the Rite of Heredom having jurisdiction over 25
degrees.
"
But already a controversy had arisen with parties acting under, or deriving
their powers from, the Supreme Council at Charleston. We may well believe that
Cerneau and his associates soon recognized the impossibility of maintaining
successfully a rite of twenty- five degrees against one of thirty-three degrees...
The Thirty -third degree as now existing originated at Charleston in 1801 ; and
no evidence has been found that Cerneau ever received it. "
Cerneau
seems however to have overlooked the obvious expedient of creating a 34th
degree !
"
The Charleston body did not recognize the Cerneau Bodies even by silent
acquiescence ; after investigation by a special Deputy, it declared, early in
1814, Cerneau to be an impostor, and his organizations illegal and clearly
clandestine. "
"
Bitter controversies followed. " Lodges which soon died were opened at
Charleston. Others at New Orleans eked out a precarious existence under James
Foulhouze.
"
Foulhouze had received the Thirty-third degree from the Grand Orient of France,
which expelled him, Feb. 4, 1859, for a scurrilous publication which he issued
in answer to one of its decrees. This Supreme Council became dormant; but, in
1867, it was revived with Eugene Chassaignac at its head ; in 1868 it was recognized
by the Grand Orient of France, and unless it has recently gone out of
existence, the Grand-Orient to-day recognizes a so-called Supreme Council in
New Orleans as a lawful body, and its members as possessing the Thirty-third
degree ! "
In 1826
the Morgan murder occurred and Cerneauleft for France. De Witt Clinton,
Governor of New York, had been Deputy Grand Commander of the Sovereign
Consistory from 1811 to 1823 when he was elected Grand Commander.
A number
of sporadic revivals of this rite occurred during the ensuing 40 years.
They
were known as — The Hicks Rite, founded in 1832 by Comte de St. Laurent.
The
First Atwood Body, founded about 1837 by Henry C. Atwood.
The
Cross Body, founded about 1851 by Jeremy L. Cross.
The
Second Atwood Body, founded about 1853.
It was
not till 1867 that peace was established between the three de facto Supreme
Councils in the northern part of the United States. On that date they united
and Josiah H. Drummond was elected Grand Commander.
After
five years of peace, however, Henry J. Seymour, who had been expelled by the
council of which he was a member, organized what he called a Supreme Council of
which he was made Grand Commander, " but, on a visit to Europe in 1862, in
his eagerness to obtain recognition, he unwittingly held Masonic communication
with the Grand Orient of France, which created such a storm that he resigned
his office, and since but little has been heard of that Supreme Council,
although it probably still exists. "
"
In 1881, Hopkins Thompson, an Emeritus member of the Supreme Council, assisted
by a few Honorary members and by a Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret, who is
believed by many to have been the mainspring of the movement, all of whom had
taken the oath of fealty to the Supreme Council, formed an association, which
they are pleased to call the Cerneau Supreme Council ' revived '. "
"
This body claims jurisdiction over the South, the claim to which was abandoned,
before 1866, by unanimous vote, including Thompson's ! It denies the legality
of the Southern Supreme Council, from which alone the Thirty-third degree came,
and which Thompson by his vote recognized and whose recognition and fraternal
support, he, with his associates, sought to obtain. "
The
visit to Europe of Henry J. Seymour referred to in the above quotation had
serious consequences. We find that Seymour at that time was in communication
with John Yarker with whom he collaborated in founding the Ancient and
Primitive Rite, the ramifications of which reach to all the branches of occult
illuminism such as Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia, Memphis and Mizraim,
Ancient Order of Oriental Templars, etc.
.
CHAPTER
LXV
CARBONARISM
(THE
ALTA VENDITA)
(HAUTE
VENTE D'lTALIE)
(Alta
Vendita [Lodge] Founded 1809)
The Carbonari
had existed internationally, it is said, under different names since the days
of Francis I, King of France, but not till the year 1815 did we begin to hear
of its individual historical achievements.
The
following is a translation of one of the secret official documents published in
Italy by the highest authority of the order, for the guidance of the active
head-centres of Masonry in 1818, under the title of : Permanent Instructions,
or Practical Code of Rules; Guide for the Heads of the Highest Grades of
Masonry . The original Italian document was given to Nubio, one of the Supreme
Vendita (Alta Vendita) in 1824, when he was sent to Rome to carry it into
effect, and it was to this instruction that he referred when he wrote from
Forli to Signor Volpi : " As I have written to you before, I am appointed
to demoralise the education of the youth of the Church". When these
documents were lost, the Freemasons offered fabulous sums for their recovery.
These secret Instructions, intended only for a chosen few Masons of heavy
calibre, were written three years after what was called the " Restoration
" of 1815, which was brought about by a number of veteran Freemasons, all
born in the past century, who had preceded, made, planned, and passed through the
French Revolution of 1789. They were rife with the republican notions of France
and Italy. They had survived their works, and had been in a great measure
defeated, or at least modified, by Napoleon, in whose hands they were like a
boat in the hands of new pilots, and, stunned by the many changes, were
motionless for a time. In 1815, brought, as it were, in presence of a new
world, they took breath and courage, and gathering up the broken threads of the
tangled skein, determined to spend the rest of their lives in restoring, if
possible, the web commenced in 1789 and 1783. The principal author was supposed
to be a man of the name of Filippo Buonarotti, one of the great correspondents
of Nubio. From his biography, given in the eighth volume of the Mondo Segreto
di Castro, he would appear to have been an apt pupil and follower of Nubio's
principle, Ama nesciri et pro nihilo computari. He was born at Pisa in 1761,
was a friend of Robespierre, and an enemy of Napoleon, against whom he always
con spired. He was a centre in Paris for both French and Italian Carbonari. He
had been one of the principals in 1821, 2 and in 1830 founded the sect of the
Apofesimeni. In a published record, entitled Bologna of the New Secret Society,
1835, we find the name of a young man, Giuseppe Petroni, afterwards a celebrated
Mazzinian, and now (1878) Grand Master Aggunto of Roman Masonry of the Via
della Valle, who was likewise one of this noble band. My readers may now thoroughly
understand the character of the authors of this secret and curious document of
the Instructions.
It is a
resume and summary, expressed in the clearest terms, of the aim of Freemasonry
and the means by which it is attained ; Freemasonry antecedent to the French
Revolution; Freemasonry during the French Revolution ; Freemasonry revived
after the Restoration. Freemasonry, to-day, is one and the same, using the same
means to work out the same end and object.
"
So these old conspirators of the past century wakened up in 1815 from their
long sleep more energetic than ever, and as a first step towards reviving their
secret society work, wrote the following Permanent Instructions, as a guide for
the Higher initiated who were chosen to command the whole Masonic movement,
especially in Italy : —
"
Now that we are constituted in an active body, and that our Order begins to
reign as well in places most remote as in those that are nearest ov r centre,
one great thought arises, a thought that has always greatly preoccupied the men
who aspire to the universal regeneration of the world, that thought is, the
Liberation of Italy, for from Italy shall one day issue the freedom of the
entire world — a Republic of Fraternity, Harmony, and Humanity. This great idea
is not yet comprehended by our brothers of France. They believe that
revolutionary Italy can only plot in the shade, and accomplish the stabbing of
a few spies, cr traitors, meantime bearing patiently the yoke of facts accomplished
elsewhere, for Italy, but without Italy. This error has been very fatal to us.
It is useless to combat it with words which would only propagate more. It is
necessary to annihilate it with facts. And in the midst of anxieties, which
agitate the most vigorous spirits of 'our society, one there is that can never
be forgotten.
The
Papacy ever exercises a decisive influence over the lot of Italy. With the arm,
the voice, the pen, of its innumerable bishops, monks, nuns, and faithful of
all latitudes, the Pope finds everywhere persons enthusiastically prepared for sacrifice,
and even for martyrdom, friends who would die for him, or sacrifice all for his
love. It is a mighty lever, the full power of which few Popes understood, and
which has as yet been used but partially. The question of to-day is not the
reconstruction of a momentarily weakened power.
"
Our final aim is that of Voltaire and of the French Revolution, — the complete
annihilation of Catholicism, and ultimately of Christianity. Were Christianity
to survive, even upon the ruins of Rome, it would, a little later on, revive
and live. We must now consider how to reach our end, with certainty, not
cheating ourselves with delusions, which would prolong indefinitely, and
probably compromise, the ultimate success of our cause.
"
Hearken not to those boastful and vainglorious French, and thick headed
Germans, and hypochondriacal Englishmen, who seem to think it possible to end
Catholicism, at one time by an obscene song, at another by an absurd sophism,
and again by a contemptible sarcasm. Catholicism has a vitality which survives
such attacks with ease. She has seen adversaries more implacable and more
terrible far, and sometimes has taken a malicious pleasure in baptising with
holy water the most rabid amongst them. We may therefore allow our brethren in
those countries to work off their frenzy of anti-catholic zeal, allow them to
ridicule our Madonnas and our apparent devotion. Under this cloak, we may
conspire at our convenience, and arrive, little by little, at our ultimate aim.
"
Therefore, the Papacy has been for seventeen hundred years interwoven with the
history of Italy. Italy can neither breathe nor move without the leave of the
Supreme Pontiff. With him, she has the hundred arms of Briareus ; without him,
she is condemned to a lamentable impotency, and to divisions and hostility,
from the foot of the Alps to the last pass of the Appennines. Such a state of
things must not remain. It is necessary to seek a remedy. Very well. The remedy
is at hand. The Pope, whoever he may be, will never enter into a secret
society. It then becomes the duty of the Secret Society to make the first
advance to the Church and to the Pope, with the object of conquering both. The
work for which we gird ourselves up, is not the work of a day, nor of a month,
nor of a year.
"
It may last for many years, perhaps for a century; in our ranks the soldier dies,
but the war is continued. We do not at present intend to gain the Pope to our
cause, nor to make him a neophyte to our principles, or a propagator of our
ideas. Such would be an insane dream. Even should it happen that any Cardinal,
or any Prelate, of his own will, or by deception, should share in our secrets,
such would not be a reason for desiring his exaltation to the Chair of Peter.
Nay, his very exaltation would be our ruin; for this reason that, his apostasy
being prompted by his ambition alone, that very ambition of power would
necessarily impel him to sacrifice us.
"
Catholics ! what must we consider Freemasonry, when Freemasons themselves
pronounce it an apostasy from Catholicity, and foresee that a power fully
acquainted with them and their machinations would, as a consequence, seek to
crush them.
"
That which we should seek, that which we should await, as the Jews await a
Messiah, is a Pope according to our wants. An Alexander VI would not suit us,
for he never erred in religious doctrine ; a Pope Borgia would not suit us, for
he was excommunicated by all the thinking philosophers and unbelievers for the
vigour with which he defended the Church. We require a Pope for ourselves, if
such a Pope were possible. With such a one we should march more securely to the
storming of the Church than with all the little books of our French and English
brothers.
"
And why ? Because it were useless to seek with these alone to split the rock
upon which God has built his Church. We should not want the vinegar of Hannibal,
nor gunpowder, nor even our arms, if we had but the little finger of the
successor of Peter engaged in the plot ; that little finger would avail us more
for our crusade than all the Urbans II and St. Bernards for the crusade of
Christianity. We trust that we may yet attain this supreme object of our
efforts.
"
But when ? and how ? The unknown cannot yet be seen. Nevertheless, as nothing
should move us from our mapped-out plan, we must labour at our newly-commenced
work as if tomorrow were to crown it with success. We wish, in this
Instruction, which should be kept concealed from those simply initiated, to
give advice to the rulers of the Supreme Vendita, which they, in turn, should
inculcate in the brethren by means of Insegnamento, or Memorandum.
"
Little can be done with old Cardinals and with prelates of decided character.
Such incorrigibles must be left to the school of Gonsalvi, and in our magazines
of popularity and unpopularity, we must find the means to utilize, or ridicule,
power in their hands.
A well
invented report must be spread with tact amongst good Christian families : such
a Cardinal, for instance, is a miser : such a prelate is licentious ; such an
official is a freethinker, an infidel, a Freemason, and so on in the same
strain. These things will spread quickly to the cafes, thence to the squares,
and one report is sometimes enough to ruin a man.
"
If a prelate, or bishop, arrive in a province from Rome, to celebrate or
officiate at some public function, it is necessary at once to become acquainted
with his character, his antecedents, his temperament, his defects especially his defects. If he should be our
enemy an Albani, a Pallotta, a Bernetti,
a Delia Genga, a Rivarola at once trap him, entangle him in all the nets and
snares you can. Give him a character which must horrify the young people and
the women ; describe him as cruel, heartless, and bloodthirsty ; relate some
atrocious transaction which will easily cause a sensation amongst the people.
The foreign newspapers will learn and copy these facts, which they will know
how to embellish and colour according to their usual style.
"
For respect due to truth show, or better still, quote from some respectable
fool as having quoted the number of the journal which has given the names, acts
and doings of these personages. As in England and in France, so also in Italy
there will be no lack of writers who well know how to tell lies for the good
cause, and have no difficulty in doing so. One newspaper publishing the name of
a Monsignor Delegate, His Excellency, or Eminence, or Lord Justice, will be
quite sufficient proof for the people ; they will require no other. The people
here around us in Italy are in the infancy of Liberalism. At present they
believe in the Liberals, after a little they will believe in anything. "
Modern
Carbonarism was founded in 1815 by Maghella, a native of Genoa, who, at the
time when Joachim Murat became King of the two Sicilies, was a subordinate of
Saliceti, the Neapolitan Minister of Police. He was a Freemason, who exempted
from initiation and probation all Freemasons who desired to become Carbonari.
Any one who has read the statutes and ritual of Carbonarism will see that it is
one and the same as that of Masonry.
A
sequence of events pertaining to Carbonarism can be traced by the perusal of
several works from which we quote :
At a
meeting held on Oct. 13th 1820 by the Grand Secret Consistory, the Orient of
Scotland was recognized. The two Consistories of Masonry in France and in Italy
and that of the Sublime Carbonari were put into communication and their
co-operation assured.
The high
ruling grades of the Carbonari appear to have been those of Sublime Maitre
Parfait, above which was still another that of the Sublime Elus.
The Alta
Vendita constituted the Supreme Directory of the Carbonari and was led by a
group of Italian noblemen, amongst whom a prince, " the profoundest of
initiates, was charged as Inspector General of the Order. "
Piccolo
Tigre, a certain nondescript Jew, rushed about Europe obeying orders and
presumably giving them, but what he actually did has remained a mystery.
Giuseppe
Mazzini had been initiated Carbonaro in 1827. 6 Some time after, Carbonarism
combined, or rather coalesced, with the Society known as Young Italy led by Mazzini
whose aims were identical with those of the Carbonari.
Young
Italy, Young Poland, Young England, Young Switzerland, Young Ireland — all
together Young Europe — all international movements of the same character
working towards the same end, viz. the supremacy of the Masters.
The
Guelphic Knights, whose object was the independence of Italy, to be effected by
means of all the secret societies of the country under their leadership, found
able helpers in the Carbonari.
"
The Chiefs of the Carbonari were also chiefs among the Guelphs ; but only those
that had distinct offices among the Carbonari could be admitted among the
Guelphs. There can be no doubt that the Carbonari when the sect had become very
numerous, partly sheltered themselves under the designation of Guelphs and
Adelphi or Independents, by affiliating themselves to these societies. "
At one
time the support of the Carbonari was offered by Maghella to Murat with the
advice to declare against Napoleon and to proclaim the independence of Italy
but Murat's subsequent proscription of the sect induced it to seek the support
of England. The Bourbons and Lord William Bentinck favoured it while Murat
ordered its extermination. Some of its leaders indeed perished but shortly afterwards
the society was reorganized and a schismatic sect calling itself Calderari
(Braziers) came into being.
For the
root of this movement see Chapter LIII.
For the
development of this movement see Chapters LXX, LXXI, XCIII.
CHAPTER
LXVI
THE
MANCHESTER UNITY OF ODDFELLOWS ENGLAND
(Founded
1810)
We find
the following in the article on Oddfellows, in Hastings' Encyclopaedia of
Religions and Ethics.
"
R. W. Moffrey (Century p. 18) fixes the year 1810 as that in which the
Manchester Unity of Oddfellows started, though it was not till 1814 that the
minutes of its Grand Committees began to be printed... however Spry (Hist, of
Oddfellowship p. 16) gives minutes of a meeting of a ' lodge ' No. 9, of the
Order of Oddfellows, dated 12th March 1748, from which it would seem that eight
previous lodges had been established before that date. "
For the
connection of this order with Freemasonry see Chapter XXVIII.
We also
note the following : —
"
The position of Friendly Societies generally before the introduction of
National Insurance is shown in the report of the Chief Registrar of Friendly
Societies for the year ending 31st December 1906 (Parliamentary Papers of
Session 1907, n° 49, xi pp. 16-18). "
According
to this report, we find that the order had 1,035,785 members and the income of
the benefit funds was £1,703,674.
The
Oddfellows resisted any proposal of State control or State interference with
the working of Friendly Societies.
The
English Order has four degrees.
CHAPTER
LXVII
THE
HETAIRIA OF GREECE
(ETHERISTS)
(Founded
1814)
Hetairia
was the Greek name for societies, organizations or associations. In ancient
Greece the name hetairia applied to companies in the army. In more modern
times, it was used for societies of learning, or commercial purposes and also
for political secret societies.
It is in
connection with the latter that we are concerned. While Greece was under
Turkish dominion, the national aspirations of its people could be vented in
secret only. The breath of revolution which swept Europe during the latter part
of the 18th century stirred some of the Greek patriots whose aims was the
overthrow of the Turkish power. The main leader at that time was Constantin
Rhygas (1754-1798).
He
formed the first secret societies of Hetairias which were mainly composed of
Klephtes or bandits. Bound by oath, each member of the society was to use all
means, assassination included, to free Greece. The execution of Rhygas drove
the hetairias to seek cover but in 1814, a chief lodge was re-formed in Odessa
under the name of Hetairia phileke. Its avowed aim was the liberation of Greece,
and its main seat was in Russia. Every candidate took an oath, as in all secret
societies, and knew no one beyond his initiator and sponsor. Funds, collected
and administered by a superior council directing all the lodges, were kept in
Russia.
When a
sufficient number of Hetairias were organized and a chief needed to direct the
movement against Turkey, Count Capo d'Istria, (John, 1776- 1831) a Greek,
minister in Russia under the Tzar Alexander I, and author of the text of the
Holy Alliance was asked to take the lead but refused, and Alexander Ypsilanti
was nominated. The insurrection broke out in 1821.
Among
the most prominent members of the Hetairia we find Alexander Mavrocordato
(1791-1865) who was under the influence of England and was also the friend of
Byron whom he had met in Missolonghi in 1822. From him he received funds for
the purchase of arms to the extent of one hundred thousand francs. It is
related that Lord Byron died in his arms at Missolonghi in 1824. Among the
supporters of the London Branch of the Philhellenic Committee were Jeremy
Bentham, Sir Francis Burdett, Lord Erskine, Lord Ebrington, Sir John Cam
Hobhouse, (afterwards Lord Brougham) Joseph Hume, Sir James Mackintosh and Lord
John Russell. These foreign committees provided arms, money and volunteers.
The
following details concerning the organization of the Hetairia of Greece are set
forth in The Secret Societies of the European Revolution, by Thomas Frost (Vol.
II, page 47 et seq.).
"
Less simple than that of the Carbonari, the system rather resembled that of the
Illuminati in the number of grades and relation of the branch societies to each
other. "
There
were five grades namely : —
The
Adelphoi (Brothers, who took an oath of secrecy but ignored the aims of the
society), The Systemenoi (Bachelors, who knew that Greece was to be freed by
revolution),
The
Priests of Eleusis,
The
Prelates (knowing all the secrets),
The
Grand Arch (The supreme directing control
of 12
members).
"
Early in 1827 a motion was unanimously adopted by the Senate favouring the
placing of Greece under the protection of Great Britain. " This followed a
secret interview of Mavrocordato with Sir Stratford Canning, but Mavrocordato
retired from public life " on the failure of his project for the
establishment of a constitutional kingdom under British protection."
"
Hostilities in Greece were finally terminated, in the summer of 1828, by a
convention concluded at Alexandria between Admiral Codrington and Mehemet Ali,
by which the latter agreed to withdraw the Egyptian troops from the Morea.
"
The
arbitrary government of Capo d'Istria ended on October 24, 1831, when he was
assassinated.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar